BrokenMeta.gg
FR EN
B
TFT Set 18

Caustic Veigar Reroll= 0.19

Level 8
Placement
4.85
Top 4
40%
Contest.
81

Full composition

Veigar
JeweledGauntletBlueBuffSpearOfShojin
Kobuko
WarmogsArmorGargoyleStoneplateSunfireCape
Rek'Sai
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorSpiritVisage
Teemo
Kog'Maw
Rammus
Fiddlesticks
EmblemSprykin
Tristana
Gnar

Traits

Sprykin Sprykin 6/7
Brawler Brawler 3/4
Invoker Invoker 2/3
Blackthorn Blackthorn 2/4
Defender Defender 2/4
Spellweaver Spellweaver 2/4
Caustic Caustic 1
Flora Fatalis Flora Fatalis 1/2
Elderwood Elderwood 1/3
Adaptor Adaptor 1/2
Hunter Hunter 1/2
Fae Fae 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Veigar
Veigar
ComboAvg placement
BlueBuffHextechGunbladeJeweledGauntlet
4.93
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcap
3.67
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothSpearOfShojin
4.75
Artifact_DawncoreJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
4.00
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
4.83
BlueBuffGiantSlayerJeweledGauntlet
5.40
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletStrikersFlail
5.33
HextechGunbladeJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
6.33
Artifact_LudensTempestJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
5.67
Artifact_DawncoreBlueBuffRabadonsDeathcap
3.67
Kobuko
Kobuko
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
2.50
DragonsClawIonicSparkWarmogsArmor
5.00
BrambleVestGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
4.50
Rek'Sai
Rek'Sai
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
5.18
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
3.62
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisage
5.50
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplate
5.75
DragonsClawGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
4.33
GargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
4.67
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeart
5.00
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorWarmogsArmor
5.00
EmblemSprykinGargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplate
6.00
GargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeartSteadfastHeart
4.50

Seen on the TOP ladders

KR skymoney#done GRANDMASTER 521 LP 5
BR manu#ivy GRANDMASTER 381 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Defender Cassiopeia 50 encounters 38%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 40 encounters 48%
vs Summoner Zyra 38 encounters 45%
vs Solar Kayle 38 encounters 50%
vs Battlemage Sivir 28 encounters 43%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 26 encounters 38%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 26 encounters 54%
vs Emerald Ahri 19 encounters 26%
vs Fae Tristana 18 encounters 39%
vs Solar Xayah 17 encounters 35%
vs Greenfather Amumu 17 encounters 35%
vs Executioner Soraka 16 encounters 31%
vs Emerald Morgana 16 encounters 44%
vs Battlemage Nidalee 16 encounters 44%
vs Summoner Soraka 14 encounters 71%
vs Rival Kha'Zix 13 encounters 69%
vs Emerald Aphelios 13 encounters 38%
vs Blossom Ahri 12 encounters 42%
vs Caustic Kog'Maw 12 encounters 50%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 11 encounters 36%

Board variants

FiddlesticksKobukoKog'MawRammusRek'SaiTeemoTristanaVeigar
Baseline
16% of games 5.17 avg placement
FiddlesticksKobukoKog'MawRammusRek'SaiTeemoVeigar
Tristana
13% of games 6.00 avg placement
FiddlesticksGnarKobukoKog'MawRammusRek'SaiSettTeemoVeigar
Tristana
GnarSett
8% of games 2.64 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Incomplete attempts grouped here

Kog'Maw Sprykin Kog'Maw 8 units 9 games · 3.56 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.