BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Riftbeast Scuttlecrab▲ 1.50

Level 8
Placement
5.38
Top 4
32%
Contest.
85

This comp was Tier C in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 14), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Pebbles
Cinderling
Scuttlecrab
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorSpiritVisage
Murkwolf
Gromp
Krug
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorThiefsGloves
Sentinel
ProtectorsVowGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
Brambleback
Elder Dragon

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~88 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Riftbeast Riftbeast 8/10
Invoker Invoker 2/3
Apex Predator Apex Predator 1
Ravager Ravager 1/2
Adaptor Adaptor 1/2
Hunter Hunter 1/2
Juggernaut Juggernaut 1/2
Vanguard Vanguard 1/2
Brawler Brawler 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Scuttlecrab
Scuttlecrab
ComboAvg placement
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
3.82
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisage
4.38
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
4.67
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
6.00
DragonsClawGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
5.60
GargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeartWarmogsArmor
5.50
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisage
6.00
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageSteadfastHeart
6.00
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplate
5.67
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageSunfireCape
5.00
Krug
Krug
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
5.33
Sentinel
Sentinel
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
4.00
AdaptiveHelmGargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVow
3.67

Seen on the TOP ladders

KR 자신있는 도박#LTZ CHALLENGER 868 LP 4

Matchups vs

Not enough shared-lobby encounters for this comp in this sample.

Board variants

GrompMurkwolfPebblesRakanScuttlecrab
Baseline
3% of games 6.75 avg placement
GrompMurkwolfPebblesRakanScuttlecrabSentinel
→
Sentinel
2% of games 6.00 avg placement
BramblebackElder DragonKrugMurkwolfPebblesScuttlecrabSentinel
GrompRakan
→
BramblebackElder DragonKrugSentinel
2% of games 7.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
+2 units (11 total)
AsheTaric
Ashe + Taric 3.00 avg placement · 2 games
GnarTaric
Gnar + Taric 1.50 avg placement · 2 games
LuxMama Beak
Lux + Mama Beak 3.50 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.