What tier is Riftbeast Scuttlecrab on TFT Set 18?

Riftbeast Scuttlecrab is currently Tier B on TFT Set 18, with a 5.35 average placement and 33% top 4 rate over 126 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Riftbeast Scuttlecrab▼ 0.79

Level 8

Placement

5.35

Top 4

33%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~90 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Riftbeast 8/10

Invoker 2/3

Apex Predator 1

Ravager 1/2

Adaptor 1/2

Hunter 1/2

Juggernaut 1/2

Vanguard 1/2

Brawler 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Scuttlecrab

Combo	Avg placement
	2.33
	4.40
	6.00
	6.67
	4.33
	5.50
	4.00
	6.00
	6.00
	6.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

No leaderboard player has played this comp in the last 10 observed games.

Matchups vs

vs Defender Cassiopeia 43 encounters 30%

vs Solar Kayle 37 encounters 51%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 30 encounters 33%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 24 encounters 21%

vs Emerald Aphelios 21 encounters 48%

vs Riftbeast Mama Beak 18 encounters 22%

vs Solar Xayah 17 encounters 47%

vs Greenfather Ahri 16 encounters 12%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 15 encounters 27%

vs Elderwood LeBlanc 14 encounters 43%

vs Battlemage Sivir 14 encounters 36%

vs Blossom Ahri 14 encounters 64%

vs Caustic Kog'Maw 14 encounters 43%

vs Summoner Zyra 13 encounters 23%

vs Summoner Soraka 13 encounters 62%

vs Fae Tristana 13 encounters 54%

vs Emerald Morgana 12 encounters 50%

vs Adaptor Kog'Maw 12 encounters 25%

vs Greenfather Morgana 10 encounters 10%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 10 encounters 10%

Board variants

Baseline

6.75 avg placement

→

6.00 avg placement

→

2.00 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.