This comp was Tier A in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 14), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.
Full composition
Traits
Blossom
6/7
Spellweaver
3/4
Rival
2
Flora Fatalis
1/2
Adaptor
1/2
Juggernaut
1/2
Brawler
1/2
Executioner
1/2
Defender
1/2
Summoner
1/2
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|
|
4.40 |
|
3.62 |
|
3.67 |
|
4.60 |
|
3.40 |
|
2.00 |
|
4.00 |
|
4.67 |
|
2.50 |
|
3.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
AF Doréto#FRAUD
CHALLENGER
1523 LP
1
EUW
MKOI Safo20#BAD
CHALLENGER
916 LP
1
KR
머희루#111
CHALLENGER
1086 LP
2
EUW
Kojnid#AUT
CHALLENGER
1718 LP
4
EUW
vi113#5751
CHALLENGER
821 LP
4
NA
CTG Marcel P#NA2
CHALLENGER
1374 LP
4
BR
Verus#tft
GRANDMASTER
431 LP
6
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
1% of games
5.50 avg placement
1% of games
5.50 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Incomplete attempts grouped here
Rival Yunara
8 units
89 games · 5.42 avg placement
Rival Karma
7 units
40 games · 6.38 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.
Broken.gg
