Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
3.67 |
|
5.00 |
|
7.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.60 |
|
4.07 |
|
6.00 |
|
5.17 |
|
5.14 |
|
6.43 |
|
5.29 |
|
4.33 |
|
5.00 |
|
5.80 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
6.00 |
|
3.75 |
|
1.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
BR
Só bio#gag
GRANDMASTER
410 LP
1
EUW
Mujjiwaraa#EUW
MASTER
308 LP
2
NA
dpei#NA1
GRANDMASTER
356 LP
2
BR
JosneyQT#1308
MASTER
18 LP
2
KR
NAVI Jip pok#navi
CHALLENGER
902 LP
2
KR
MidnightChess#TFT
GRANDMASTER
382 LP
2
KR
종 범#TFT
MASTER
236 LP
3
KR
우도아재#kr2
MASTER
190 LP
3
EUW
whyyoumadpro#EUW
CHALLENGER
1053 LP
4
NA
dpei#NA1
GRANDMASTER
356 LP
4
NA
MJS Deleted#NA2
GRANDMASTER
242 LP
4
NA
jeddi#YER
MASTER
157 LP
4
BR
Slooper#BR2
MASTER
4 LP
4
KR
Roll Some Mo#KR1
GRANDMASTER
231 LP
4
EUW
GodL Rykomastery#GodL
GRANDMASTER
446 LP
5
NA
VP Mariss#Maris
GRANDMASTER
428 LP
5
KR
난몰라#KR1
GRANDMASTER
304 LP
5
BR
HIGH Hatsu#3030
MASTER
136 LP
6
EUW
Lloydd#237
GRANDMASTER
213 LP
7
BR
JosneyQT#1308
MASTER
18 LP
7
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
18% of games
3.67 avg placement
14% of games
5.29 avg placement
12% of games
4.85 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.