B
Emerald Cassiopeia▲ 0.52
Placement
4.75
Top 4
38%
Contest.
52
Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
Cassiopeia
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|---|
|
3.40 |
  |
6.00 |
 |
3.00 |
 |
7.00 |
 |
4.00 |
 |
7.00 |
 |
8.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
7.00 |
Morgana
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|---|
 |
3.40 |
|
5.00 |
|
6.00 |
  |
3.00 |
 |
7.00 |
 |
4.00 |
|
7.00 |
Sentinel
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|---|
 |
5.00 |
 |
6.00 |
 |
1.00 |
|
4.00 |
   |
7.00 |
 |
8.00 |
 |
7.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
qsedkwj#9999
MASTER
194 LP
1
NA
PoTFT#THAI
MASTER
169 LP
3
EUW
Desper#TFT
MASTER
265 LP
5
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
25% of games
4.75 avg placement
12% of games
6.00 avg placement
12% of games
3.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
4.75 avg placement · 4 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.