Full composition
Traits
Brawler
2/4
Executioner
2/3
Bounty Seeker
1
Attuned
1
Apex Predator
1
Emerald Aspect
1
Riftbeast
2/3
Blossom
2/3
Elderwood
1/3
Hunter
1/2
Inferno
1/2
Vanguard
1/2
Lunar
1/2
Spellweaver
1/2
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|
|
3.00 |
|
7.00 |
|
1.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|
|
8.00 |
|
2.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
2.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|
|
3.00 |
|
7.00 |
|
2.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
2.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Cackleprikelcakl#EUWW
GRANDMASTER
534 LP
1
EUW
Nuryy7#EUW
GRANDMASTER
297 LP
7
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
23% of games
3.00 avg placement
23% of games
7.00 avg placement
15% of games
8.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.
Broken.gg
