Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
5.38 |
|
6.32 |
|
5.79 |
|
5.88 |
|
6.08 |
|
5.33 |
|
7.09 |
|
4.30 |
|
4.60 |
|
5.67 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Hmoon#buh
GRANDMASTER
478 LP
2
NA
EricWei#1412
GRANDMASTER
306 LP
2
BR
Majorana#RAI
MASTER
51 LP
2
KR
JooLee#0000
MASTER
194 LP
2
KR
백승민#agent
CHALLENGER
703 LP
3
KR
Souly#KR2
GRANDMASTER
522 LP
3
KR
차 차#1107
GRANDMASTER
219 LP
3
EUW
PapyScotch#EUW
GRANDMASTER
497 LP
4
NA
Cheche#tefet
GRANDMASTER
303 LP
4
NA
TTV thekrayc#NA1
GRANDMASTER
158 LP
4
NA
满船清梦压星河#cyy
MASTER
204 LP
5
KR
여쩌리#KR1
GRANDMASTER
359 LP
5
KR
너가 좀 알려줘#Chzzk
GRANDMASTER
326 LP
5
EUW
KimChaewon676767#NERV
MASTER
188 LP
6
NA
rety#0530
MASTER
149 LP
6
NA
jasonjava#NA1
MASTER
90 LP
6
NA
salty#ate6
MASTER
74 LP
6
BR
Mestre da Bocha#edson
CHALLENGER
972 LP
6
BR
Fodska#6666
MASTER
263 LP
6
BR
Fshaves#TFT
MASTER
83 LP
6
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
33% of games
6.04 avg placement
29% of games
5.84 avg placement
3% of games
5.92 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Incomplete attempts grouped here
ZyraUniqueTrait Brambleback
8 units
21 games · 5.48 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.