BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Rival Sivir▼ 1.21

Level 8
Placement
4.24
Top 4
54%
Contest.
90

This comp was Tier A in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 14), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Rakan
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorThiefsGloves
Kobuko
Rengar
EdgeOfNightGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
Vi
Tristana
Rammus
Sivir
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
Lillia
Ashe

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~82 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Sprykin Sprykin 3/5
Hunter Hunter 3/4
Fae Fae 3/4
Primal Primal 2/4
Juggernaut Juggernaut 2/4
Defender Defender 2/4
Rival Rival 1/2
Vanguard Vanguard 1/2
Brawler Brawler 1/2
Blossom Blossom 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Rengar
Rengar
ComboAvg placement
EdgeOfNightEmblemSprykinGuinsoosRageblade
4.90
EdgeOfNightGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
3.60
EdgeOfNightEmblemHunterGuinsoosRageblade
3.44
EdgeOfNightEmblemSprykinTitansResolve
2.57
EdgeOfNightEmblemHunterTitansResolve
1.67
EdgeOfNightEmblemHunterEmblemSprykin
4.00
EmblemHunterGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
3.00
EdgeOfNightGuinsoosRagebladeSteraksGage
3.00
EmblemHunterEmblemSprykinQuicksilver
5.00
EmblemHunterEmblemSprykinTitansResolve
3.75
Sivir
Sivir
ComboAvg placement
InfinityEdgeRedBuffSpearOfShojin
4.06
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperRedBuff
3.54
LastWhisperRedBuffSpearOfShojin
2.36
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
3.73
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
5.10
DeathbladeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
2.89
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeRedBuff
2.75
GuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdgeLastWhisper
4.62
DeathbladeGuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdge
3.29
InfinityEdgeSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
2.71

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Desper#TFT CHALLENGER 910 LP 1
KR 챌린저 문단속#KR1 CHALLENGER 987 LP 4
KR 인성파탄난쓰레기#1234 CHALLENGER 786 LP 5

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 12 encounters 83%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 9 encounters 33%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 9 encounters 11%
vs Caustic Nidalee 6 encounters 67%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 6 encounters 67%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 6 encounters 50%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 5 encounters 0%
vs Emerald Morgana 5 encounters 60%

Board variants

KobukoLilliaRakanRammusRengarSivirTristanaVi
Baseline
4% of games 3.41 avg placement
KobukoRakanRammusRengarSivirTristanaVi
Lillia
→
3% of games 4.50 avg placement
KobukoLilliaRammusRengarSivirTristanaVi
Rakan
→
2% of games 5.44 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.