BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
C
TFT Set 18

FloraFatalis Azir Reroll= 0.16

Level 8
Sample confidence: High (1465 games). See how this is calculated →
Placement
4.43
Top 4
50%
Contest.
100

Full composition

Veigar
Teemo
VoidStaffMorellonomiconSpearOfShojin
Azir
HextechGunbladeGuinsoosRagebladeRabadonsDeathcap
Fiddlesticks
ThiefsGlovesWarmogsArmorSunfireCape
Rammus
Soraka
Zyra
EmblemExecutioner

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 8, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~60 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Sprykin Sprykin 3/5
Blackthorn Blackthorn 2/4
Executioner Executioner 2/3
Defender Defender 2/4
Spellweaver Spellweaver 2/4
Flora Fatalis Flora Fatalis 2
Summoner Summoner 2/3
Thornmaiden Thornmaiden 1
Invoker Invoker 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Azir
Azir
ComboAvg placement
GuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunbladeRabadonsDeathcap
3.94
ArchangelsStaffGuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunblade
4.88
GuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunbladeStrikersFlail
5.19
HextechGunbladeRabadonsDeathcapRabadonsDeathcap
4.03
HextechGunbladeRabadonsDeathcapStrikersFlail
4.15
GiantSlayerGuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunblade
3.73
GuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunbladeJeweledGauntlet
4.24
GuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunbladeVoidStaff
5.65
GuinsoosRagebladeHextechGunbladeRabadonsDeathcap_Radiant
3.91
ArchangelsStaffHextechGunbladeRabadonsDeathcap
4.43

Seen on the TOP ladders

BR Verus#tft GRANDMASTER 431 LP 3
EUW shreddin#EUWU CHALLENGER 1222 LP 6
BR DobZ#1987 CHALLENGER 568 LP 8

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 606 encounters 49%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 371 encounters 53%
vs Caustic Nidalee 341 encounters 55%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 292 encounters 52%
vs Emerald Ahri 254 encounters 41%
vs Summoner Zyra 252 encounters 57%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 251 encounters 48%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 233 encounters 51%
vs Greenfather Amumu 224 encounters 49%
vs Emerald Morgana 215 encounters 44%
vs Invoker Morgana 196 encounters 53%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 178 encounters 47%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 178 encounters 43%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 174 encounters 49%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 167 encounters 56%
vs Invoker Ahri 155 encounters 65%
vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 153 encounters 61%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 143 encounters 31%
vs Greenfather Ahri 137 encounters 46%
vs Greenfather Morgana 133 encounters 45%

Board variants

AzirFiddlesticksRammusSorakaTeemoVeigarZyra
Baseline
44% of games 5.71 avg placement
AzirFiddlesticksKennenRammusSorakaTeemoVeigarZyra
→
Kennen
8% of games 2.33 avg placement
AzirEzrealFiddlesticksRammusSorakaTeemoVeigarZyra
→
Ezreal
6% of games 2.83 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 7 units 5.71 avg placement · 651 games
+1 unit (8 total)
Kennen
Kennen 2.33 avg placement · 120 games
Ezreal
Ezreal 2.83 avg placement · 94 games
Lux
Lux 1.97 avg placement · 39 games
Yunara
Yunara 2.94 avg placement · 34 games
Malphite
Malphite 2.86 avg placement · 28 games
+2 units (9 total)
KennenLux
Kennen + Lux 1.44 avg placement · 9 games
IvernKennen
Ivern + Kennen 2.20 avg placement · 5 games
IvernLux
Ivern + Lux 1.00 avg placement · 4 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.