What tier is Greenfather Morgana on TFT Set 18?

Greenfather Morgana is currently Tier S on TFT Set 18, with a 3.69 average placement and 64% top 4 rate over 518 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Greenfather Morgana= 0.03

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (518 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.69

Top 4

64%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~82 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Invoker 3/4

Vanguard 3/4

Lunar 2/3

Spellweaver 2/4

Greenfather 1

Attuned 1

Emerald Aspect 1

Riftbeast 2/3

Blossom 2/3

Ravager 1/2

Coven 1/3

Brawler 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Morgana

Combo	Avg placement
	3.32
	3.34
	3.14
	3.75
	4.05
	3.69
	4.19
	2.47
	3.40
	3.25

Sentinel

Combo	Avg placement
	3.62
	3.80
	2.90
	2.78
	2.43
	3.00
	2.29
	4.67
	1.50
	3.40

Ahri

Combo	Avg placement
	3.66
	3.50
	4.61
	4.11
	3.00
	2.20
	2.40

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW blah blah blah#tft CHALLENGER 1084 LP 1

EUW SXY BanaWest#SXY CHALLENGER 686 LP 1

NA jdzielinski#PMD1 CHALLENGER 823 LP 1

NA GambaGoblin#1649 CHALLENGER 616 LP 1

NA cawluhn#91709 CHALLENGER 611 LP 1

BR DobZ#1987 CHALLENGER 568 LP 1

BR caoMei#2942 CHALLENGER 547 LP 1

BR HIGH GuiOliveira#0709 GRANDMASTER 459 LP 1

BR O VASCO#VAS MASTER 282 LP 1

BR AURA Erza#BR10 GRANDMASTER 272 LP 1

EUW mp1#EUW2 CHALLENGER 1203 LP 2

NA imriveting#NA1 CHALLENGER 1160 LP 2

NA junglebook1#NA1 CHALLENGER 1052 LP 2

NA VIT k3soju#000 CHALLENGER 782 LP 2

NA LC Dominus#CAPO CHALLENGER 618 LP 2

BR Mecmeno#AMOR CHALLENGER 1532 LP 2

BR Jinx#levis GRANDMASTER 456 LP 2

NA ACAD Dishsoap#NA3 CHALLENGER 840 LP 3

NA grea#melt CHALLENGER 801 LP 3

BR Kaiser#23135 CHALLENGER 632 LP 3

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 224 encounters 57%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 133 encounters 55%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 131 encounters 69%

vs Summoner Zyra 123 encounters 70%

vs Caustic Nidalee 105 encounters 76%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 99 encounters 61%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 82 encounters 60%

vs Greenfather Amumu 72 encounters 58%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 69 encounters 41%

vs Emerald Morgana 66 encounters 53%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 59 encounters 73%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 57 encounters 53%

vs Invoker Morgana 57 encounters 54%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 56 encounters 59%

vs Solar Kayle 51 encounters 76%

vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 51 encounters 63%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 51 encounters 80%

vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 51 encounters 47%

vs Executioner Ezreal 49 encounters 59%

vs Rapidfire Aphelios 48 encounters 40%

Board variants

Baseline

2.94 avg placement

→

3.49 avg placement

→

5.28 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.