Full composition
Traits
Invoker3/4
Riftbeast3/5
Vanguard2/4
Brawler2/4
Old Growth1
Greenfather1
Emerald Aspect1
Blossom2/3
Coven1/3
Juggernaut1/2
Spellweaver1/2
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.15 |
|
2.33 |
|
4.43 |
|
1.67 |
|
4.40 |
|
3.00 |
|
4.00 |
|
4.50 |
|
1.00 |
|
3.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
1.83 |
|
4.00 |
|
2.33 |
|
2.33 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
2.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
8.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
whyyoumadpro#EUW
CHALLENGER
1053 LP
1
EUW
Lallana#1300
GRANDMASTER
500 LP
1
EUW
Lozux#xdd
MASTER
376 LP
1
NA
ROC Lilbear#1122
GRANDMASTER
209 LP
1
NA
ausername#8948
MASTER
162 LP
1
EUW
Nuryy7#EUW
GRANDMASTER
336 LP
2
NA
TinyJeff18#NA1
MASTER
205 LP
3
NA
salty#ate6
MASTER
74 LP
3
BR
ZT ian#TFT
MASTER
34 LP
3
KR
희 구#0825
MASTER
203 LP
3
EUW
UrangUtan#Affe
GRANDMASTER
369 LP
4
NA
junglebook1#NA1
CHALLENGER
636 LP
4
NA
wovencord#NA1
MASTER
122 LP
4
NA
wyft#na123
GRANDMASTER
187 LP
5
BR
JuanGhurkas#Doom
GRANDMASTER
226 LP
5
KR
리 키#4080
GRANDMASTER
208 LP
5
EUW
Cackleprikelcakl#EUWW
GRANDMASTER
278 LP
6
KR
ruoved#디바우어
MASTER
238 LP
6
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
11% of games
2.90 avg placement
10% of games
3.39 avg placement
7% of games
4.64 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.