Full composition
Traits
Rapidfire4/5
Vanguard4/6
Riftbeast3/5
Ravager2/4
Fae2/4
Lunar2/3
Elderwood2/3
Invoker1/2
Juggernaut1/2
Inferno1/2
Summoner1/2
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.14 |
|
4.20 |
|
5.00 |
|
6.20 |
|
4.25 |
|
3.00 |
|
4.25 |
|
3.33 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.67 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
blah blah blah#tft
GRANDMASTER
448 LP
1
EUW
br0ken99#HR1
GRANDMASTER
423 LP
1
BR
Bapzera#BR4
CHALLENGER
1129 LP
1
KR
MidnightChess#TFT
GRANDMASTER
382 LP
1
KR
Stily#KR1
GRANDMASTER
332 LP
1
EUW
Phos#EU123
GRANDMASTER
459 LP
2
EUW
JustPaz#Smoge
MASTER
241 LP
2
NA
k0nda1#vovo
GRANDMASTER
395 LP
2
BR
To de atestado#0101
GRANDMASTER
308 LP
2
KR
S0N4G1#고윤하
GRANDMASTER
314 LP
2
EUW
para#liv
MASTER
235 LP
3
NA
Deis1k#NA1
GRANDMASTER
340 LP
3
NA
CrazyCat#Kitty
MASTER
113 LP
3
BR
JosneyQT#1308
MASTER
18 LP
3
NA
MrBombastic#NA1
MASTER
134 LP
4
EUW
MOUZ Kubixon#0752
GRANDMASTER
403 LP
5
NA
silencer142#NA1
GRANDMASTER
253 LP
6
NA
me1stor8th#NA2
MASTER
68 LP
6
KR
LJW#KOR
GRANDMASTER
305 LP
6
NA
CrazyCat#Kitty
MASTER
113 LP
7
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
5% of games
3.80 avg placement
4% of games
3.00 avg placement
4% of games
6.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.