Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.20 |
|
1.75 |
|
3.50 |
|
3.00 |
|
6.50 |
|
3.00 |
|
2.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.14 |
|
2.80 |
|
3.00 |
|
4.71 |
|
4.60 |
|
5.50 |
|
4.33 |
|
6.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.35 |
|
5.00 |
|
1.75 |
|
4.29 |
|
3.67 |
|
3.40 |
|
1.80 |
|
3.00 |
|
6.75 |
|
3.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
blah blah blah#tft
GRANDMASTER
448 LP
1
EUW
Stormy#88888
MASTER
176 LP
1
NA
ACAD wasian#NA2
GRANDMASTER
278 LP
1
BR
Lefeco#br1
GRANDMASTER
251 LP
1
KR
연수사랑해#개얼짱훈녀
GRANDMASTER
225 LP
1
EUW
MKOI ODESZA#000
MASTER
366 LP
4
NA
CTG Souless#001
GRANDMASTER
356 LP
4
NA
Deis1k#NA1
GRANDMASTER
340 LP
6
KR
북조선집행자진우#KR2
GRANDMASTER
216 LP
6
EUW
sova2332#J34
GRANDMASTER
318 LP
7
NA
KocLV#FREE
MASTER
73 LP
7
EUW
Nuryy7#EUW
GRANDMASTER
336 LP
8
KR
메가유석#KR1
MASTER
218 LP
8
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
17% of games
4.52 avg placement
6% of games
3.67 avg placement
5% of games
2.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
1.50 avg placement · 4 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Incomplete attempts grouped here
Juggernaut Tristana
8 units
42 games · 4.74 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.