Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.77 |
|
4.25 |
|
3.47 |
|
3.53 |
|
4.07 |
|
5.56 |
|
3.56 |
|
6.29 |
|
2.00 |
|
5.33 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.17 |
|
5.75 |
|
3.82 |
|
5.00 |
|
4.50 |
|
4.86 |
|
3.43 |
|
5.17 |
|
1.33 |
|
4.80 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.43 |
|
2.29 |
|
2.60 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
GodL Gobosteur#WTB
CHALLENGER
697 LP
1
EUW
Dicob#BAO
GRANDMASTER
581 LP
1
EUW
sκρsτ#EDG
MASTER
246 LP
1
NA
Ripple Overdrive#NA1
CHALLENGER
500 LP
1
BR
Slooper#BR2
MASTER
4 LP
1
EUW
Hmoon#buh
GRANDMASTER
478 LP
2
NA
DINOSAUR#NUGZ
MASTER
139 LP
2
BR
Slooper#BR2
MASTER
4 LP
2
BR
Slooper#BR2
MASTER
4 LP
2
KR
실력과운#본캐임
GRANDMASTER
481 LP
2
KR
S0N4G1#고윤하
GRANDMASTER
314 LP
2
EUW
Phos#EU123
GRANDMASTER
459 LP
3
EUW
Lozux#xdd
MASTER
376 LP
3
EUW
SXY BanaWest#SXY
GRANDMASTER
240 LP
3
EUW
M TFT#TFT1
MASTER
205 LP
3
NA
Kyivix#NA1
MASTER
69 LP
3
BR
fsn#BR2
MASTER
122 LP
3
KR
Liam1#KRKR
GRANDMASTER
219 LP
3
KR
티 모#2048
MASTER
192 LP
3
EUW
Ariana Grande#Livie
MASTER
160 LP
4
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
42% of games
5.39 avg placement
8% of games
2.76 avg placement
5% of games
2.63 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
2.76 avg placement · 29 games
+1 unit (10 total)
Diana
2.00 avg placement · 3 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.