What tier is Emerald Morgana on TFT Set 18?

Emerald Morgana is currently Tier S on TFT Set 18, with a 3.96 average placement and 60% top 4 rate over 879 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Emerald Morgana= 0.09

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (879 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.96

Top 4

60%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~84 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Invoker 3/4

Riftbeast 3/5

Spellweaver 3/4

Blossom 3/5

Vanguard 2/4

Brawler 2/4

Attuned 1

Emerald Aspect 1

Coven 1/3

Lunar 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Morgana

Combo	Avg placement
	3.79
	3.75
	3.71
	3.50
	4.10
	4.29
	3.52
	3.17
	2.90
	3.86

Sentinel

Combo	Avg placement
	3.19
	3.86
	3.68
	3.41
	3.14
	3.00
	2.27
	2.90
	3.50
	3.89

Ahri

Combo	Avg placement
	4.13
	3.69
	3.71
	3.89
	3.64
	3.50
	4.57
	3.64
	4.00
	4.10

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW KimChaewon676767#NERV CHALLENGER 958 LP 1

EUW Jigoa#xdd CHALLENGER 786 LP 1

NA imriveting#NA1 CHALLENGER 1160 LP 1

NA Kurumx#FREAK CHALLENGER 1124 LP 1

NA jcuuub#NA2 CHALLENGER 706 LP 1

NA pitzy#2676 CHALLENGER 645 LP 1

NA cawluhn#91709 CHALLENGER 611 LP 1

BR Bapzera#BR4 CHALLENGER 1936 LP 1

BR eusouolucas#1212 CHALLENGER 1355 LP 1

BR TTTango#tango CHALLENGER 628 LP 1

BR J V#FORJA CHALLENGER 552 LP 1

BR Midoriya#midu GRANDMASTER 520 LP 1

BR Aleloツ#podre GRANDMASTER 308 LP 1

KR Parryberry#1111 CHALLENGER 929 LP 1

KR 토라오니#253 CHALLENGER 784 LP 1

EUW SLY Voltariux#EUW CHALLENGER 1266 LP 2

EUW i am patoska#EUW CHALLENGER 1258 LP 2

EUW G1nkgo#2002 CHALLENGER 1029 LP 2

EUW NoNameGuy#TFT CHALLENGER 766 LP 2

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 399 encounters 54%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 222 encounters 61%

vs Caustic Nidalee 221 encounters 60%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 215 encounters 56%

vs Summoner Zyra 183 encounters 65%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 166 encounters 47%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 135 encounters 47%

vs Emerald Ahri 120 encounters 53%

vs Greenfather Amumu 119 encounters 46%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 112 encounters 55%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 106 encounters 58%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 100 encounters 61%

vs Solar Kayle 97 encounters 71%

vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 96 encounters 65%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 95 encounters 63%

vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 93 encounters 53%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 76 encounters 70%

vs Executioner Soraka 75 encounters 63%

vs Invoker Morgana 73 encounters 66%

vs Executioner Ezreal 73 encounters 53%

Board variants

Baseline

5.08 avg placement

→

2.35 avg placement

→

3.11 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 2.97 avg placement · 31 games

+1 unit (10 total)

Fiddlesticks 2.00 avg placement · 2 games

Lux 2.50 avg placement · 2 games

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.