BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
S
TFT Set 18

Executioner Ezreal= 0.10

Level 9
Sample confidence: Medium (526 games). See how this is calculated →
Placement
3.97
Top 4
63%
Contest.
96

Full composition

Ornn
Yunara
Alistar
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorBrambleVest
Fiddlesticks
IonicSparkWarmogsArmorGargoyleStoneplate
Ezreal
SpearOfShojinLastWhisperDeathblade
Soraka
Sett
Ahri
EmblemExecutioner
Kennen

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~60 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Executioner Executioner 4
Elderwood Elderwood 3/5
Blossom Blossom 3/5
Brawler Brawler 2/4
Defender Defender 2/4
Spellweaver Spellweaver 2/4
Flora Fatalis Flora Fatalis 2
Inferno Inferno 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ezreal
Ezreal
ComboAvg placement
DeathbladeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
3.77
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
3.79
DeathbladeRedBuffSpearOfShojin
3.20
LastWhisperSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
4.17
LastWhisperRedBuffSpearOfShojin
3.56
GiantSlayerLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
4.46
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
4.25
DeathbladeSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
4.00
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeLastWhisper
3.33
DeathbladeLastWhisperStrikersFlail
3.22

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Sologesang#EUW CHALLENGER 870 LP 1
EUW Rubic#1453 CHALLENGER 796 LP 1
NA douyin搜擎苍电竞#2345 CHALLENGER 1007 LP 1
KR 코끼리비스킷#KR1 CHALLENGER 1261 LP 1
KR steelo of bora#azika CHALLENGER 1133 LP 1
KR RonaldoOfTFT#KRSIU CHALLENGER 1009 LP 1
KR 빈 틈#123 CHALLENGER 907 LP 1
KR 록 달#0908 CHALLENGER 800 LP 1
EUW Ken Kitade#Kash CHALLENGER 960 LP 2
NA ACAD wasian#NA2 CHALLENGER 799 LP 2
BR TFT DANDAN#DANN CHALLENGER 709 LP 2
BR DUSK Kabessaaun#BR01 GRANDMASTER 621 LP 2
BR deka#tftgg GRANDMASTER 364 LP 2
KR 자신있는 도박#LTZ CHALLENGER 868 LP 2
EUW PMK PainGetsReal#PMK CHALLENGER 980 LP 3
EUW vi113#5751 CHALLENGER 821 LP 3
NA VIT k3soju#000 CHALLENGER 782 LP 3
BR LeuzZoka#TFT CHALLENGER 861 LP 3
BR right mistake#goat MASTER 306 LP 3
KR 띵 땡#KR1 CHALLENGER 1611 LP 3

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 235 encounters 57%
vs Caustic Nidalee 122 encounters 67%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 120 encounters 60%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 112 encounters 59%
vs Summoner Zyra 109 encounters 63%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 94 encounters 53%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 75 encounters 57%
vs Invoker Morgana 75 encounters 52%
vs Emerald Morgana 73 encounters 47%
vs Emerald Ahri 72 encounters 46%
vs Solar Kayle 70 encounters 77%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 68 encounters 56%
vs Greenfather Amumu 68 encounters 60%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 66 encounters 39%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 61 encounters 52%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 54 encounters 56%
vs Greenfather Morgana 49 encounters 41%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 48 encounters 40%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 47 encounters 60%
vs Invoker Ahri 46 encounters 65%

Board variants

AhriAlistarEzrealFiddlesticksOrnnSettSorakaYunara
Baseline
9% of games 5.17 avg placement
AhriEzrealFiddlesticksGnarKennenOrnnSettSorakaYunara
Alistar
→
GnarKennen
4% of games 3.22 avg placement
AhriEzrealFiddlesticksGnarOrnnSettSorakaYunara
Alistar
→
Gnar
4% of games 4.54 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 4.17 avg placement · 18 games
+1 unit (10 total)
Ivern
Ivern 3.00 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.