Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.57 |
|
5.29 |
|
4.59 |
|
5.87 |
|
3.79 |
|
5.25 |
|
4.33 |
|
3.33 |
|
4.33 |
|
4.40 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.65 |
|
4.22 |
|
3.00 |
|
5.11 |
|
5.67 |
|
5.89 |
|
4.12 |
|
2.75 |
|
5.43 |
|
4.17 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
GodL Gobosteur#WTB
CHALLENGER
697 LP
1
EUW
Dicob#BAO
GRANDMASTER
581 LP
1
EUW
Higa#gmgn
GRANDMASTER
345 LP
1
NA
LF Goth Femboys#whnzz
MASTER
105 LP
1
KR
치지직 칸#1229
GRANDMASTER
382 LP
1
EUW
shreddin#EUWU
GRANDMASTER
371 LP
2
EUW
Paran01d#002
MASTER
188 LP
2
KR
슬슬버스타볼까나#KR1
GRANDMASTER
441 LP
2
KR
175 65 18#KR1
GRANDMASTER
180 LP
2
EUW
MIH TarteMan#QLF
GRANDMASTER
398 LP
3
NA
rety#0530
MASTER
149 LP
3
BR
devilman#001
MASTER
31 LP
3
EUW
Meshade#TFT
MASTER
170 LP
4
NA
imriveting#NA1
GRANDMASTER
500 LP
4
NA
ausername#8948
MASTER
162 LP
4
BR
Só bio#gag
GRANDMASTER
410 LP
4
KR
딘 슈 송#KR1
GRANDMASTER
176 LP
4
EUW
qsedkwj#9999
MASTER
194 LP
5
EUW
NABAWIX#EUX
GRANDMASTER
158 LP
5
KR
pad0#파 도
GRANDMASTER
321 LP
5
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
27% of games
5.39 avg placement
15% of games
5.26 avg placement
5% of games
5.91 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.