BrokenMeta.gg
FR EN
B

Invoker Morgana= 0.07

Level 8
Placement
4.42
Top 4
48%
Contest.
94

Full composition

Pebbles
EmblemLunar
Karma
EmblemInvokerThiefsGlovesSpearOfShojin
Krug
EmblemCoven
Kog'Maw
EmblemLunar
Hecarim
Morgana
VoidStaffMorellonomiconRedBuff
Sentinel
ProtectorsVowAdaptiveHelmGargoyleStoneplate
Ahri
EmblemInvoker
Sett

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Morgana
Morgana
ComboAvg placement
MorellonomiconRabadonsDeathcapVoidStaff
4.36
JeweledGauntletMorellonomiconVoidStaff
4.24
HextechGunbladeMorellonomiconVoidStaff
4.12
ArchangelsStaffMorellonomiconVoidStaff
4.75
MorellonomiconSpearOfShojinVoidStaff
3.50
RabadonsDeathcapRedBuffVoidStaff
5.00
GiantSlayerMorellonomiconVoidStaff
3.75
HextechGunbladeRedBuffVoidStaff
4.12
ArchangelsStaffRedBuffVoidStaff
4.17
GiantSlayerRedBuffVoidStaff
5.20
Sentinel
Sentinel
ComboAvg placement
AdaptiveHelmProtectorsVowProtectorsVow
2.25
ProtectorsVowProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
3.17
AdaptiveHelmProtectorsVowSpiritVisage
2.83
AdaptiveHelmProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
3.40
AdaptiveHelmAdaptiveHelmProtectorsVow
3.40
CrownguardEdgeOfNightThiefsGloves
5.40
GargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVowProtectorsVow
4.00
GargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeartWarmogsArmor
2.50

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW whyyoumadpro#EUW CHALLENGER 1053 LP 1
EUW SLY Voltariux#EUW GRANDMASTER 336 LP 1
NA Nik#0283 GRANDMASTER 366 LP 1
NA DeadlyCO2#NA1 MASTER 161 LP 1
EUW Nuryy7#EUW GRANDMASTER 336 LP 2
NA corduroy#euhh MASTER 110 LP 2
BR FOUR Bala#FOUR MASTER 92 LP 2
BR Подпольность#Nihil MASTER 82 LP 2
KR MidnightChess#TFT GRANDMASTER 382 LP 2
EUW Brising#SNG GRANDMASTER 217 LP 3
NA Darth Nub#NA2 MASTER 103 LP 3
BR FOUR Bala#FOUR MASTER 92 LP 3
BR Dklein#GUILD MASTER 40 LP 3
NA PoTFT#THAI MASTER 169 LP 4
NA techzz#brrr MASTER 131 LP 4
KR ich bin bin#kr3 GRANDMASTER 377 LP 4
NA Angerine#UwU MASTER 158 LP 5
BR Lionel Messi#BeTo MASTER 87 LP 5
BR Corinthians#TFT MASTER 20 LP 5
EUW KlicorneN#4444 GRANDMASTER 304 LP 6

Matchups vs

vs Summoner Zyra 138 encounters 54%
vs Battlemage Sivir 96 encounters 46%
vs Solar Kayle 93 encounters 56%
vs Summoner Soraka 82 encounters 55%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 59 encounters 36%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 53 encounters 58%
vs Battlemage Nidalee 44 encounters 59%
vs Rival Rengar 44 encounters 55%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 41 encounters 44%
vs Fae Tristana 40 encounters 62%
vs Executioner Soraka 37 encounters 22%
vs Emerald Aphelios 37 encounters 59%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 35 encounters 66%
vs Solar Xayah 35 encounters 43%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 34 encounters 47%
vs Executioner Zyra 30 encounters 40%
vs Caustic Kog'Maw 28 encounters 54%
vs Primal Sivir 24 encounters 29%
vs Rival Nidalee 21 encounters 14%
vs FloraFatalis Zyra 21 encounters 29%

Board variants

AhriHecarimKarmaKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
Baseline
19% of games 5.06 avg placement
AhriDianaKarmaKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
Hecarim
Diana
6% of games 5.17 avg placement
AhriKarmaKrugMorganaPebblesRakanSentinelSett
Hecarim
Rakan
4% of games 5.25 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 8.00 avg placement · 2 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Incomplete attempts grouped here

Karma Caustic Karma 8 units 2 games · 4.00 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.