BrokenMeta.gg
FR EN
A

Greenfather Ahri= 0.11

Level 9
Placement
3.58
Top 4
72%
Contest.
87

Full composition

Karma
Krug
EmblemVanguard
Ahri
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
Sett
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorSteadfastHeart
Sentinel
ProtectorsVowGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
Morgana
Ivern
Taric
Alune

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ahri
Ahri
ComboAvg placement
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
3.90
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
4.00
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcap
2.00
BlueBuffGiantSlayerJeweledGauntlet
3.75
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothStrikersFlail
3.75
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletStrikersFlail
4.00
EmblemInvokerGiantSlayerJeweledGauntlet
4.67
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletVoidStaff
3.00
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletJeweledGauntlet
3.00
ArchangelsStaffHextechGunbladeJeweledGauntlet
2.00
Sett
Sett
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
2.38
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeart
3.57
GargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeartWarmogsArmor
4.25
EvenshroudGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
2.50
BrambleVestCrownguardGargoyleStoneplate
2.00
DragonsClawEmblemVanguardGargoyleStoneplate
5.00
RabadonsDeathcapSteadfastHeartThiefsGloves
3.00
GargoyleStoneplateIonicSparkSpiritVisage
4.33
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
4.00
GargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVowSpiritVisage
4.33
Sentinel
Sentinel
ComboAvg placement
BlueBuffProtectorsVowSunfireCape
1.00
ArchangelsStaffKrakensFuryThiefsGloves
3.00
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVow
3.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Paran01d#002 MASTER 188 LP 1
NA KBM Toddy#tftbr GRANDMASTER 233 LP 1
NA salty#ate6 MASTER 74 LP 1
KR MidnightChess#TFT GRANDMASTER 382 LP 1
EUW Meshade#TFT MASTER 170 LP 2
NA 满船清梦压星河#cyy MASTER 204 LP 2
KR pad0#파 도 GRANDMASTER 321 LP 2
NA ACAD Dishsoap#NA3 CHALLENGER 827 LP 3
NA KocLV#FREE MASTER 73 LP 3
BR Ney4i20#4i20 MASTER 1 LP 3
KR 슬슬버스타볼까나#KR1 GRANDMASTER 441 LP 3
KR 토라오니#253 GRANDMASTER 356 LP 3
KR 필통이#KR1 GRANDMASTER 190 LP 3
EUW MKOI ODESZA#000 MASTER 366 LP 4
EUW para#liv MASTER 235 LP 4
KR 백승민#agent CHALLENGER 703 LP 4
KR 이리스#3331 CHALLENGER 509 LP 4
KR 서은지#롤좀하는가 GRANDMASTER 426 LP 5
KR Miss The Rage#TFT CHALLENGER 528 LP 7
KR 세훈에몽#KR11 CHALLENGER 538 LP 8

Matchups vs

vs Solar Kayle 58 encounters 76%
vs Summoner Zyra 56 encounters 55%
vs Battlemage Sivir 48 encounters 71%
vs Summoner Soraka 43 encounters 77%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 38 encounters 55%
vs Executioner Zyra 32 encounters 56%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 24 encounters 54%
vs Fae Tristana 24 encounters 71%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 20 encounters 70%
vs Executioner Soraka 20 encounters 50%
vs Rival Rengar 20 encounters 70%
vs Solar Xayah 18 encounters 56%
vs Battlemage Nidalee 15 encounters 87%
vs Elderwood Aphelios 15 encounters 80%
vs Emerald Aphelios 14 encounters 50%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 13 encounters 69%
vs Rival Master Yi 12 encounters 58%
vs Primal Sivir 11 encounters 64%
vs Executioner Ezreal 11 encounters 64%
vs Emerald Ahri 11 encounters 45%

Board variants

AhriIvernKarmaKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSettTaric
Baseline
10% of games 3.57 avg placement
AhriIvernKarmaKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
Taric
9% of games 4.38 avg placement
AhriAluneIvernKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSettTaric
Karma
Alune
2% of games 4.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.