What tier is Greenfather Ahri on TFT Set 18?

Greenfather Ahri is currently Tier S on TFT Set 18, with a 3.88 average placement and 61% top 4 rate over 496 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Greenfather Ahri= 0.11

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (496 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.88

Top 4

61%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~82 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Spellweaver 3/4

Blossom 3/5

Invoker 2/3

Vanguard 2/4

Brawler 2/4

Greenfather 1

Attuned 1

Emerald Aspect 1

Riftbeast 2/3

Coven 1/3

Lunar 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ahri

Combo	Avg placement
	4.24
	2.94
	4.08
	4.22
	2.82
	3.50
	3.85
	3.17
	2.80
	4.25

Sett

Combo	Avg placement
	3.32
	3.77
	3.91
	3.67
	3.33
	4.33
	4.20
	2.80
	2.80
	3.80

Sentinel

Combo	Avg placement
	3.00
	3.20
	4.56
	2.50
	4.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Vbzz#EUW CHALLENGER 1637 LP 1

EUW N03#TFTKC CHALLENGER 1067 LP 1

EUW Vomendeth#EUWW CHALLENGER 932 LP 1

EUW Higa#gmgn CHALLENGER 888 LP 1

NA Filup#TFT CHALLENGER 1366 LP 1

NA panche3e#plink CHALLENGER 1270 LP 1

NA FL Cambulee#PMD CHALLENGER 776 LP 1

BR Lefeco#br1 CHALLENGER 741 LP 1

BR polar1zed#011 CHALLENGER 631 LP 1

BR J V#FORJA CHALLENGER 552 LP 1

BR Phimas#no Mi CHALLENGER 513 LP 1

BR Fell#Feii GRANDMASTER 271 LP 1

EUW TTV KatsutaxD#TFT CHALLENGER 1454 LP 2

EUW GodL Rykomastery#GodL CHALLENGER 1397 LP 2

EUW blah blah blah#tft CHALLENGER 1084 LP 2

EUW ImpetuousPanda#TFT CHALLENGER 789 LP 2

NA senso#bub CHALLENGER 609 LP 2

BR ImpagnaT#br1 CHALLENGER 556 LP 2

BR priNcesval#777 CHALLENGER 474 LP 2

BR Sali Sali#aq2a7 GRANDMASTER 297 LP 2

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 210 encounters 56%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 139 encounters 61%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 137 encounters 54%

vs Caustic Nidalee 124 encounters 67%

vs Summoner Zyra 105 encounters 65%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 78 encounters 50%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 78 encounters 49%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 63 encounters 62%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 63 encounters 68%

vs Greenfather Amumu 63 encounters 48%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 60 encounters 57%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 55 encounters 56%

vs Invoker Ahri 51 encounters 71%

vs Emerald Ahri 50 encounters 38%

vs Invoker Morgana 50 encounters 60%

vs Solar Kayle 50 encounters 80%

vs Rapidfire Aphelios 48 encounters 62%

vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 48 encounters 48%

vs Emerald Morgana 47 encounters 55%

vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 46 encounters 63%

Board variants

Baseline

3.25 avg placement

→

5.36 avg placement

→

2.37 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.