C
Vanguard Brambleback▼ 0.37
Placement
5.93
Top 4
27%
Contest.
51
Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
Hecarim
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|---|
 |
5.00 |
 |
5.00 |
|
4.00 |
  |
1.00 |
  |
8.00 |
Brambleback
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|---|
|
8.00 |
  |
7.00 |
|
7.00 |
  |
3.00 |
  |
5.00 |
|
8.00 |
 |
5.00 |
 |
4.00 |
 |
1.00 |
Sentinel
| Combo | Avg placement |
|---|---|
|
8.00 |
|
7.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
8.00 |
|
5.00 |
 |
4.00 |
|
1.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
KR
궁디이잉#KR1
GRANDMASTER
389 LP
3
NA
metzauh#1767
GRANDMASTER
318 LP
8
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
40% of games
7.67 avg placement
13% of games
7.00 avg placement
13% of games
3.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.