BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Rival Ezreal Slow 7▼ 0.57

Level 8
Placement
4.33
Top 4
54%
Contest.
85

This comp was Tier A in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 22), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Ornn
SunfireCapeGargoyleStoneplateEvenshroud
LeBlanc
BlueBuffRabadonsDeathcapJeweledGauntlet
Alistar
Hecarim
Kha'Zix
Diana
Rengar
Ezreal
SpearOfShojinLastWhisperDeathblade
Aphelios

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Se poser au niveau 7 pour rerolls Rengar

Niveau qui minimise l'or nécessaire pour 3-coût(s) en même temps. Compter environ 116-182 or pour une chance de 25% à 75% d'obtenir toutes les copies visées (médiane ~148 or).

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Elderwood Elderwood 5/7
Rival Rival 2
Vanguard Vanguard 2/4
Lunar Lunar 2/3
Ravager Ravager 1/2
Rapidfire Rapidfire 1/2
Brawler Brawler 1/2
Executioner Executioner 1/2
Defender Defender 1/2
Spellweaver Spellweaver 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ezreal
Ezreal
ComboAvg placement
DeathbladeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
5.11
DeathbladeGiantSlayerSpearOfShojin
3.40
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
1.75
LastWhisperRedBuffSpearOfShojin
6.25
BlueBuffLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
2.67
DeathbladeRedBuffSpearOfShojin
5.00
DeathbladeGiantSlayerGuinsoosRageblade
2.67
BlueBuffGiantSlayerLastWhisper
2.00
DeathbladeGuinsoosRagebladeLastWhisper
4.00
GiantSlayerLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
2.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Dicob#BAO CHALLENGER 1364 LP 2
KR Miss The Rage#TFT CHALLENGER 847 LP 2
KR 연수사랑해#개얼짱훈녀 CHALLENGER 819 LP 2
NA FL Cambulee#PMD CHALLENGER 776 LP 3
KR Chess is cold#KR1 CHALLENGER 771 LP 4
KR Soos#7777 CHALLENGER 903 LP 6
NA Anx#TWICE CHALLENGER 757 LP 7
BR Verus#tft GRANDMASTER 431 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 29 encounters 48%
vs Caustic Nidalee 16 encounters 56%
vs Summoner Zyra 15 encounters 40%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 15 encounters 33%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 15 encounters 40%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 13 encounters 38%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 12 encounters 42%
vs Emerald Morgana 11 encounters 36%
vs Summoner Azir 10 encounters 40%
vs Greenfather Amumu 9 encounters 33%
vs Solar Kayle 9 encounters 44%
vs Executioner Soraka 9 encounters 56%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 9 encounters 78%
vs Summoner Soraka 8 encounters 75%
vs Greenfather Ahri 8 encounters 75%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 8 encounters 38%
vs Greenfather Morgana 8 encounters 12%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 7 encounters 43%
vs Spellweaver Veigar 7 encounters 57%
vs Battlemage Sivir 6 encounters 17%

Board variants

ApheliosDianaEzrealFiddlesticksHecarimKha'ZixOrnn
Baseline
5% of games 5.50 avg placement
AluneDianaEzrealFiddlesticksHecarimKha'ZixOrnn
Aphelios
→
Alune
4% of games 5.86 avg placement
AlistarAmumuDravenEzrealGnarKennenMaokaiRengarTaric
ApheliosDianaFiddlesticksHecarimKha'ZixOrnn
→
AlistarAmumuDravenGnarKennenMaokaiRengarTaric
4% of games 3.17 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.