BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
C
TFT Set 18

Emerald Ezreal= 0.17

Level 9
Sample confidence: Low (233 games). See how this is calculated →
Placement
4.93
Top 4
37%
Contest.
89

Full composition

Alistar
WarmogsArmorSpiritVisageSteadfastHeart
Ezreal
SpearOfShojinLastWhisperInfinityEdge
Amumu
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorSpiritVisage
Taric
Gnar
Kennen
Maokai
Draven
Lux

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~78 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Elderwood Elderwood 3/5
Juggernaut Juggernaut 2/4
Inferno Inferno 2/3
Brawler Brawler 2/4
Executioner Executioner 2/3
Avatar Avatar 1
Bounty Seeker Bounty Seeker 1
Old Growth Old Growth 1
Emerald Aspect Emerald Aspect 1
Sprykin Sprykin 1/3
Vanguard Vanguard 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ezreal
Ezreal
ComboAvg placement
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
4.09
DeathbladeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
5.64
LastWhisperRedBuffSpearOfShojin
5.00
LastWhisperSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
4.17
GiantSlayerLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
3.75
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
4.33
InfinityEdgeSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
5.00
DeathbladeSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
3.67

Seen on the TOP ladders

BR Teteuso10#BR1 GRANDMASTER 480 LP 1
KR 도사 삼#LHN CHALLENGER 892 LP 1
BR Phimas#no Mi CHALLENGER 513 LP 2
KR 키리기리#kiri CHALLENGER 1033 LP 2
KR 미래지양적사고#123 CHALLENGER 1015 LP 2
NA sistemi burgije#NA1 CHALLENGER 799 LP 3
BR RDG Txucas#BAGRE GRANDMASTER 263 LP 3
KR NAVI Jip pok#navi CHALLENGER 1409 LP 3
EUW IgotHAXXXeuw#EUW CHALLENGER 687 LP 4
NA YBY1#YBY2 CHALLENGER 1403 LP 4
BR Matiaxx#ego CHALLENGER 803 LP 4
BR Majorana#RAI GRANDMASTER 428 LP 4
BR Подпольность#Nihil CHALLENGER 446 LP 5
BR Yetti#000 GRANDMASTER 278 LP 5
EUW Bastida#DUMMY CHALLENGER 932 LP 6
BR right mistake#goat MASTER 306 LP 6
KR 2783946045236480#KR1 CHALLENGER 802 LP 6
KR 2783946045236480#KR1 CHALLENGER 802 LP 6
EUW yatora1#wawa CHALLENGER 1094 LP 7
EUW Catalyst TFT#EUW CHALLENGER 870 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 92 encounters 43%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 62 encounters 40%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 53 encounters 38%
vs Caustic Nidalee 49 encounters 43%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 39 encounters 23%
vs Summoner Zyra 37 encounters 51%
vs Emerald Morgana 33 encounters 24%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 31 encounters 48%
vs Invoker Morgana 31 encounters 48%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 30 encounters 57%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 29 encounters 38%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 29 encounters 48%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 29 encounters 45%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 28 encounters 57%
vs Emerald Ahri 27 encounters 37%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 27 encounters 22%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 26 encounters 46%
vs Rapidfire Aphelios 24 encounters 25%
vs Solar Kayle 23 encounters 61%
vs Blossom Ahri 22 encounters 45%

Board variants

AlistarAmumuDravenEzrealGnarKennenLuxMaokaiTaric
Baseline
15% of games 3.94 avg placement
AlistarAmumuDravenEzrealGnarKennenMaokaiSentinelTaric
Lux
→
Sentinel
6% of games 5.00 avg placement
AlistarAmumuDravenEzrealGnarKennenMaokaiTaric
Lux
→
3% of games 6.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.94 avg placement · 35 games
+1 unit (10 total)
Sentinel
Sentinel 2.00 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.