What tier is Blossom Ahri on TFT Set 18?

Blossom Ahri is currently Tier C on TFT Set 18, with a 4.91 average placement and 42% top 4 rate over 440 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Blossom Ahri= 0.15

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (440 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

4.91

Top 4

42%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~86 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Blossom 5/7

Brawler 3/4

Spellweaver 2/4

Avatar 1

Riftbeast 2/3

Elderwood 1/3

Sprykin 1/3

Hunter 1/2

Invoker 1/2

Juggernaut 1/2

Vanguard 1/2

Summoner 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ahri

Combo	Avg placement
	4.63
	4.86
	4.54
	5.33
	4.36
	5.64
	4.56
	4.57
	4.50
	5.67

Sett

Combo	Avg placement
	5.43
	3.90
	5.33
	4.25
	5.00
	4.62
	4.88
	4.29
	4.29
	4.80

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW OTTO#aras CHALLENGER 1032 LP 1

EUW Catalyst TFT#EUW CHALLENGER 870 LP 1

EUW MKOI ODESZA#000 CHALLENGER 858 LP 1

EUW NoNameGuy#TFT CHALLENGER 766 LP 1

NA YBY1#YBY2 CHALLENGER 1403 LP 1

NA Shabamoon#0954 CHALLENGER 613 LP 1

BR Midoriya#midu GRANDMASTER 520 LP 1

KR Ssiel#3132 CHALLENGER 1145 LP 1

KR 록 달#0908 CHALLENGER 800 LP 1

EUW PapyScotch#EUW CHALLENGER 1000 LP 2

EUW br0ken99#HR1 CHALLENGER 990 LP 2

EUW vi113#5751 CHALLENGER 821 LP 2

NA inflames#TFT CHALLENGER 722 LP 2

BR Deafen#NSNP GRANDMASTER 256 LP 2

KR EZ Clap#TFT CHALLENGER 771 LP 2

EUW whyyoumadpro#EUW CHALLENGER 866 LP 3

EUW Lloydd#237 CHALLENGER 829 LP 3

EUW Lumperich007#EUW CHALLENGER 691 LP 3

NA USI Insurance#TFT CHALLENGER 860 LP 4

BR Jinx#levis GRANDMASTER 456 LP 4

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 209 encounters 46%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 103 encounters 40%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 96 encounters 53%

vs Caustic Nidalee 82 encounters 39%

vs Summoner Zyra 72 encounters 54%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 69 encounters 41%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 69 encounters 42%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 68 encounters 40%

vs Greenfather Amumu 66 encounters 42%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 59 encounters 39%

vs Emerald Ahri 51 encounters 39%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 48 encounters 38%

vs Invoker Morgana 46 encounters 54%

vs Solar Kayle 43 encounters 67%

vs Invoker Ahri 41 encounters 51%

vs Emerald Morgana 41 encounters 39%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 40 encounters 52%

vs Greenfather Sentinel 40 encounters 35%

vs Executioner Ezreal 39 encounters 38%

vs FloraFatalis Soraka 38 encounters 53%

Board variants

Baseline

5.79 avg placement

→

5.18 avg placement

→

5.44 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.