Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.69 |
|
3.93 |
|
3.69 |
|
3.15 |
|
3.50 |
|
5.73 |
|
6.67 |
|
5.67 |
|
3.83 |
|
4.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
6.43 |
|
2.92 |
|
5.60 |
|
3.11 |
|
3.50 |
|
6.40 |
|
2.00 |
|
4.00 |
|
4.50 |
|
3.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
5.67 |
|
2.67 |
|
4.33 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Ken Kitade#Kash
MASTER
267 LP
1
NA
Ripple Overdrive#NA1
CHALLENGER
500 LP
1
NA
Crushings#NA1
GRANDMASTER
213 LP
1
NA
Seasøns#JAM
MASTER
81 LP
1
KR
jjames#prac
CHALLENGER
967 LP
1
KR
지하닝#KR1
GRANDMASTER
228 LP
1
BR
eusouolucas#1212
CHALLENGER
602 LP
2
KR
Ssiel#3132
CHALLENGER
616 LP
2
KR
퍽퍽한치킨#123
MASTER
178 LP
2
EUW
RCS Quinto#RCS
MASTER
205 LP
3
NA
TTV thekrayc#NA1
GRANDMASTER
158 LP
3
KR
The Smile#겸댕뿌잉
CHALLENGER
820 LP
3
KR
Miss The Rage#TFT
CHALLENGER
528 LP
3
KR
메가유석#KR1
MASTER
218 LP
3
NA
MGHotDog#5656
GRANDMASTER
334 LP
4
NA
spethom#him
GRANDMASTER
244 LP
4
NA
MJS Deleted#NA2
GRANDMASTER
242 LP
4
NA
Crushings#NA1
GRANDMASTER
213 LP
5
BR
Fshaves#TFT
MASTER
83 LP
5
BR
GVidigal#br1
MASTER
179 LP
6
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
4% of games
4.40 avg placement
3% of games
7.14 avg placement
2% of games
3.33 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
1.00 avg placement · 2 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.