BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Fae Xayah= 0.16

Level 8
Placement
4.69
Top 4
46%
Contest.
87

This comp was Tier C in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 22), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Xayah
GuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdgeDeathblade
Rakan
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
Ornn
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
Varus
EmblemFae
Tristana
Hecarim
Lillia

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Se poser au niveau 3 pour rerolls Xayah

Niveau qui minimise l'or nécessaire pour 1-coût(s) en même temps. Compter environ 60-94 or pour une chance de 25% à 75% d'obtenir toutes les copies visées (médiane ~76 or).

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Fae Fae 4
Elderwood Elderwood 3/5
Rapidfire Rapidfire 2/3
Vanguard Vanguard 2/4
Defender Defender 2/4
Sprykin Sprykin 1/3
Hunter Hunter 1/2
Juggernaut Juggernaut 1/2
Inferno Inferno 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Xayah
Xayah
ComboAvg placement
DeathbladeGuinsoosRagebladeKrakensFury
4.41
GuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdgeKrakensFury
4.00
DeathbladeGiantSlayerGuinsoosRageblade
4.40
GuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdgeLastWhisper
3.30
DeathbladeGuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdge
4.00
GiantSlayerGuinsoosRagebladeKrakensFury
4.43
GiantSlayerGuinsoosRagebladeInfinityEdge
2.80
DeathbladeGuinsoosRagebladeLastWhisper
3.20
DeathbladeGuinsoosRagebladeGuinsoosRageblade
4.67
GuinsoosRagebladeGuinsoosRagebladeKrakensFury
3.33
Rakan
Rakan
ComboAvg placement
SpiritVisageSunfireCapeWarmogsArmor
4.33
DragonsClawGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
6.50
DragonsClawGargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisage
3.50
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
4.50
GargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVowSpiritVisage
6.50
Ornn
Ornn
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
4.80
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisage
4.00
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageSunfireCape
3.00
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageSteadfastHeart
6.00
CrownguardGargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmor
3.50
GargoyleStoneplateGargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisage
3.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW MKOI Dalesom#EUW2 CHALLENGER 1017 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs FloraFatalis Azir 11 encounters 55%
vs Caustic Aphelios 11 encounters 45%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 9 encounters 33%
vs Caustic Nidalee 8 encounters 38%
vs Emerald Morgana 7 encounters 43%
vs Emerald Ahri 6 encounters 17%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 6 encounters 83%
vs Blossom Ahri 5 encounters 60%
vs Invoker Ahri 5 encounters 80%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 5 encounters 40%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 5 encounters 40%
vs Executioner Ezreal 5 encounters 20%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 5 encounters 60%
vs Rival Rengar 5 encounters 40%

Board variants

AmumuHecarimLilliaOrnnRakanTristanaVarusXayah
Baseline
3% of games 2.86 avg placement
AlistarHecarimLeBlancLilliaOrnnRakanTristanaXayah
AmumuVarus
→
AlistarLeBlanc
2% of games 4.60 avg placement
KayleLeonaLilliaRakanSejuaniTristanaVarusXayah
AmumuHecarimOrnn
→
KayleLeonaSejuani
1% of games 4.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 7 units 5.67 avg placement · 3 games
+1 unit (8 total)
Amumu
Amumu 2.86 avg placement · 7 games
+2 units (9 total)
AmumuKennen
Amumu + Kennen 1.50 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.