Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
3.76 |
|
3.89 |
|
3.07 |
|
3.50 |
|
2.33 |
|
3.40 |
|
3.60 |
|
2.00 |
|
6.50 |
|
4.50 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.51 |
|
5.10 |
|
5.32 |
|
2.60 |
|
3.83 |
|
5.67 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.67 |
|
4.83 |
|
3.80 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
yatora1#wawa
GRANDMASTER
334 LP
1
EUW
Tsundere DeinaL#EUW
MASTER
292 LP
1
EUW
Brising#SNG
GRANDMASTER
217 LP
1
EUW
ArtDeco#4658
MASTER
196 LP
1
EUW
G2 Enzosx#3566
MASTER
182 LP
1
NA
k0nda1#vovo
GRANDMASTER
395 LP
1
NA
FARTINATOR06#fart
MASTER
178 LP
1
NA
ausername#8948
MASTER
162 LP
1
NA
Cool Guy Dom#dom
MASTER
76 LP
1
BR
polo#tft
MASTER
127 LP
1
KR
steelo of bora#azika
CHALLENGER
819 LP
1
KR
ich bin bin#kr3
GRANDMASTER
377 LP
1
EUW
PapyScotch#EUW
GRANDMASTER
497 LP
2
BR
FOUR Uaiti#br1
MASTER
211 LP
2
BR
Lionel Messi#BeTo
MASTER
87 LP
2
BR
NÃO PIVOTO#TFT
MASTER
60 LP
2
NA
IronBog#999
GRANDMASTER
287 LP
3
BR
manu#ivy
MASTER
240 LP
3
KR
ich bin bin#kr3
GRANDMASTER
377 LP
3
NA
DeadlyCO2#NA1
MASTER
161 LP
4
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
25% of games
5.34 avg placement
13% of games
2.00 avg placement
10% of games
5.52 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 8 units
2.00 avg placement · 37 games
+1 unit (9 total)
Taric
1.00 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.