What tier is Greenfather Sivir on TFT Set 18?

Greenfather Sivir is currently Tier A on TFT Set 18, with a 4.16 average placement and 53% top 4 rate over 423 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Greenfather Sivir= 0.26

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (423 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

4.16

Top 4

53%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~62 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Juggernaut 4/6

Hunter 2/3

Primal 2/4

Inferno 2/3

Vanguard 2/4

Old Growth 1

Greenfather 1

Emerald Aspect 1

Executioner 1/2

Fae 1/2

Blossom 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Sivir

Combo	Avg placement
	6.00
	3.38
	3.29
	2.86
	5.67
	5.67
	5.40
	2.40
	5.60
	4.00

Amumu

Combo	Avg placement
	4.38
	4.80
	4.60
	3.20

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW para#liv CHALLENGER 1026 LP 1

EUW Nuryy7#EUW CHALLENGER 910 LP 1

NA VIT prestivent#123 CHALLENGER 1190 LP 1

NA Joopsakid#227 CHALLENGER 938 LP 1

NA 4kaden#pee CHALLENGER 780 LP 1

NA Crushings#NA1 CHALLENGER 714 LP 1

NA GodlyDestroyer9#3004 CHALLENGER 687 LP 1

NA senso#bub CHALLENGER 609 LP 1

NA I coinflip lane#NA1 CHALLENGER 607 LP 1

BR ego illusions#ego CHALLENGER 1644 LP 1

BR DobZ#1987 CHALLENGER 568 LP 1

BR J V#FORJA CHALLENGER 552 LP 1

BR FOUR vakio#br1 CHALLENGER 514 LP 1

BR Slooper#BR2 CHALLENGER 473 LP 1

BR Paulo Brif Cadu#5345 MASTER 445 LP 1

BR FlameguiistaTFT#br1 GRANDMASTER 354 LP 1

BR Sali Sali#aq2a7 GRANDMASTER 297 LP 1

BR M4 Digs#TFT GRANDMASTER 267 LP 1

KR 오타쿠#aaa CHALLENGER 1327 LP 1

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 209 encounters 50%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 126 encounters 59%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 95 encounters 64%

vs Caustic Nidalee 86 encounters 53%

vs Summoner Zyra 78 encounters 56%

vs Emerald Ahri 67 encounters 55%

vs Emerald Morgana 59 encounters 58%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 55 encounters 42%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 51 encounters 53%

vs Greenfather Amumu 49 encounters 49%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 49 encounters 49%

vs Invoker Ahri 48 encounters 52%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 47 encounters 53%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 45 encounters 60%

vs Spellweaver LeBlanc 44 encounters 45%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 40 encounters 78%

vs Executioner Ezreal 40 encounters 40%

vs Summoner Soraka 38 encounters 55%

vs Summoner Azir 37 encounters 68%

vs Greenfather Ahri 37 encounters 49%

Board variants

Baseline

3.52 avg placement

→

3.89 avg placement

→

2.72 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.52 avg placement · 64 games

+1 unit (10 total)

Alune 1.50 avg placement · 4 games

Soraka 1.67 avg placement · 3 games

Lux 1.00 avg placement · 2 games

Draven 1.50 avg placement · 2 games

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.