BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
C
TFT Set 18

Spellweaver Ahri▼ 0.34

Level 8
Sample confidence: Low (264 games). See how this is calculated →
Placement
4.68
Top 4
44%
Contest.
91

Full composition

Karma
EmblemLunarTacticiansCapeThiefsGloves
LeBlanc
Fiddlesticks
SunfireCapeIonicSparkThiefsGloves
Cassiopeia
Ahri
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
Sett
Lillia
EmblemSpellweaver
Sentinel
Alune

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~86 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Spellweaver Spellweaver 6
Blossom Blossom 3/5
Defender Defender 2/4
Attuned Attuned 1
Flora Fatalis Flora Fatalis 1/2
Elderwood Elderwood 1/3
Coven Coven 1/3
Invoker Invoker 1/2
Vanguard Vanguard 1/2
Brawler Brawler 1/2
Riftbeast Riftbeast 1/3
Fae Fae 1/2
Lunar Lunar 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ahri
Ahri
ComboAvg placement
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
4.83
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
4.65
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothSpearOfShojin
4.54
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletStrikersFlail
5.29
GiantSlayerJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
5.00
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothStrikersFlail
5.40
Artifact_LudensTempestJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
4.00
RabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
5.00
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothRabadonsDeathcap
5.25
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
6.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW AL3XEM#GGEZ CHALLENGER 1672 LP 1
EUW xus0o#2c2w CHALLENGER 1138 LP 1
NA Kurumx#FREAK CHALLENGER 1124 LP 1
KR 오타쿠#aaa CHALLENGER 1327 LP 1
KR 밀 책#Check CHALLENGER 903 LP 1
EUW KURFUZZLED#EUW CHALLENGER 1120 LP 2
KR Soos#7777 CHALLENGER 903 LP 3
BR Slooper#BR2 CHALLENGER 473 LP 4
BR Matiaxx#ego CHALLENGER 803 LP 5
BR Hikki#BR1 GRANDMASTER 296 LP 5
BR Kaiser#23135 CHALLENGER 632 LP 6
EUW Skipaeus#9232 CHALLENGER 1335 LP 7
EUW bliss#22322 CHALLENGER 805 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 110 encounters 47%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 65 encounters 57%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 59 encounters 44%
vs Caustic Nidalee 53 encounters 53%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 50 encounters 52%
vs Summoner Zyra 42 encounters 29%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 41 encounters 46%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 40 encounters 50%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 38 encounters 55%
vs Emerald Ahri 36 encounters 56%
vs Invoker Morgana 32 encounters 44%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 31 encounters 48%
vs Greenfather Amumu 31 encounters 35%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 28 encounters 32%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 25 encounters 44%
vs Invoker Ahri 24 encounters 54%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 24 encounters 71%
vs Executioner Soraka 24 encounters 33%
vs Emerald Morgana 23 encounters 17%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 23 encounters 52%

Board variants

AhriAlistarAluneCassiopeiaFiddlesticksLeBlancOrnnRek'SaiVeigar
Baseline
3% of games 1.89 avg placement
AhriAlistarFiddlesticksLeBlancOrnnRek'SaiVeigar
AluneCassiopeia
→
3% of games 5.44 avg placement
AhriAluneKarmaKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
AlistarCassiopeiaFiddlesticksLeBlancOrnnRek'SaiVeigar
→
KarmaKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
3% of games 4.88 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.