BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
B
TFT Set 18

Caustic Ahri▲ 0.34

Level 9
Sample confidence: Low (169 games). See how this is calculated →
Placement
4.69
Top 4
49%
Contest.
86

Full composition

Karma
SpearOfShojinNashorsToothThiefsGloves
Pebbles
Kog'Maw
ThiefsGlovesHextechGunbladeGuinsoosRageblade
Krug
Ahri
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
Sett
Sentinel
Morgana
Taric

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~78 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Invoker Invoker 4/5
Riftbeast Riftbeast 3/5
Blossom Blossom 3/5
Vanguard Vanguard 2/4
Brawler Brawler 2/4
Spellweaver Spellweaver 2/4
Caustic Caustic 1
Emerald Aspect Emerald Aspect 1
Adaptor Adaptor 1/2
Coven Coven 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Ahri
Ahri
ComboAvg placement
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
4.46
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
3.92
ArchangelsStaffJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
5.67
EmblemInvokerJeweledGauntletStrikersFlail
3.25
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothRabadonsDeathcap
5.00
JeweledGauntletJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
5.75
GiantSlayerJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
2.33
HextechGunbladeJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
6.33
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothSpearOfShojin
3.00
BlueBuffJeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcap
4.33

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Higa#gmgn CHALLENGER 888 LP 1
NA torontokyoArkjow#NA2 CHALLENGER 613 LP 1
KR si9n#KR1 CHALLENGER 1252 LP 1
BR Só bio#gag CHALLENGER 1472 LP 2
BR Jinx#levis GRANDMASTER 456 LP 2
KR simjoo#2330 CHALLENGER 1023 LP 2
NA dpei#NA1 CHALLENGER 969 LP 3
BR Taliyent#mao CHALLENGER 1238 LP 3
KR 종 범#TFT CHALLENGER 1155 LP 3
NA haimahalfman#47777 CHALLENGER 1063 LP 4
BR FOUR zak#TFT GRANDMASTER 570 LP 5
BR Anklam#br1 GRANDMASTER 353 LP 6
KR 수 민#김정모 CHALLENGER 948 LP 6
KR 너가 좀 알려줘#Chzzk CHALLENGER 940 LP 6
EUW mp1#EUW2 CHALLENGER 1203 LP 7
NA Chuyen2311#NA1 CHALLENGER 881 LP 7
NA Dreynox#NA1 CHALLENGER 730 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 73 encounters 44%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 51 encounters 51%
vs Caustic Nidalee 39 encounters 44%
vs Summoner Zyra 37 encounters 59%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 34 encounters 38%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 31 encounters 23%
vs Greenfather Amumu 31 encounters 42%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 30 encounters 53%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 29 encounters 48%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 25 encounters 36%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 24 encounters 54%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 23 encounters 43%
vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 21 encounters 43%
vs Executioner Ezreal 21 encounters 33%
vs Emerald Morgana 20 encounters 50%
vs Emerald Ahri 20 encounters 35%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 18 encounters 61%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 17 encounters 29%
vs Executioner Soraka 15 encounters 40%
vs Invoker Morgana 13 encounters 38%

Board variants

AhriKarmaKog'MawKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
Baseline
22% of games 5.53 avg placement
AhriKarmaKog'MawKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSettTaric
→
Taric
16% of games 3.56 avg placement
AhriHecarimKarmaKog'MawKrugMorganaPebblesSentinelSett
→
Hecarim
4% of games 3.33 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.56 avg placement · 27 games
+1 unit (10 total)
Alune
Alune 4.00 avg placement · 3 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.