Caustic Ahri▼ 0.33

Level 8

Placement

4.72

Top 4

48%

Contest.

Full composition

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Kog'Maw

Combo	Avg placement
	3.00
	7.00

Ahri

Combo	Avg placement
	5.00
	4.75
	3.86
	7.00
	4.33
	8.00
	2.00
	3.00
	1.00
	5.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

NA VIT setsuko#NA2 CHALLENGER 1009 LP 2

BR Yujih1#BR1 MASTER 244 LP 6

Matchups vs

vs Battlemage Sivir 44 encounters 50%

vs Summoner Zyra 43 encounters 70%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 27 encounters 41%

vs Solar Kayle 19 encounters 53%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 13 encounters 15%

vs Summoner Soraka 12 encounters 50%

vs FloraFatalis Soraka 9 encounters 33%

vs Rival Rengar 9 encounters 44%

vs Elderwood Aphelios 9 encounters 44%

vs Caustic Nidalee 8 encounters 88%

vs Spellweaver Ahri 7 encounters 100%

vs Rival Kha'Zix 7 encounters 57%

vs Fae Tristana 7 encounters 43%

vs Rival Nidalee 7 encounters 14%

vs Emerald Aphelios 7 encounters 43%

vs FloraFatalis Veigar 7 encounters 43%

vs Primal Sivir 6 encounters 67%

vs Executioner Ezreal 6 encounters 67%

vs Solar Varus 6 encounters 17%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 6 encounters 67%

Board variants

Baseline

3.73 avg placement

→

5.00 avg placement

→

2.00 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.73 avg placement · 11 games

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.