What tier is Greenfather Aphelios on TFT Set 18?

Greenfather Aphelios is currently Tier S on TFT Set 18, with a 3.59 average placement and 72% top 4 rate over 318 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Greenfather Aphelios= 0.01

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (318 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.59

Top 4

72%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~70 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Adaptor 2/3

Primal 2/4

Invoker 2/3

Rapidfire 2/3

Juggernaut 2/4

Inferno 2/3

Vanguard 2/4

Lunar 2/3

Greenfather 1

Caustic 1

Ravager 1/2

Riftbeast 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Aphelios

Combo	Avg placement
	3.78
	3.42
	2.47
	2.93
	3.42
	3.67
	3.90
	3.89
	3.89
	3.25

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW HASHIDA#EUW CHALLENGER 697 LP 1

NA haimahalfman#47777 CHALLENGER 1063 LP 1

NA ACAD wasian#NA2 CHALLENGER 799 LP 1

NA Cool Guy Dom#dom CHALLENGER 694 LP 1

KR 발 명#1234 CHALLENGER 1027 LP 1

EUW GodL Rykomastery#GodL CHALLENGER 1397 LP 2

EUW Clemou#WTB CHALLENGER 812 LP 2

NA VIT setsuko#NA2 CHALLENGER 1549 LP 2

BR TTTango#tango CHALLENGER 628 LP 2

BR NÃO PIVOTO#TFT CHALLENGER 615 LP 2

BR caoMei#2942 CHALLENGER 547 LP 2

BR M4 Digs#TFT GRANDMASTER 267 LP 2

KR 띵 땡#KR1 CHALLENGER 1611 LP 2

KR Lisitsa#XXX CHALLENGER 1193 LP 2

EUW PMK h4udrauf#7777 CHALLENGER 724 LP 3

NA Nik#0283 CHALLENGER 1232 LP 3

NA inflames#TFT CHALLENGER 722 LP 3

NA Picklesucker#Slorp CHALLENGER 648 LP 3

BR koke#four GRANDMASTER 513 LP 3

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 88 encounters 68%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 85 encounters 66%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 81 encounters 63%

vs Summoner Zyra 63 encounters 67%

vs Caustic Nidalee 55 encounters 76%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 55 encounters 65%

vs Emerald Ahri 52 encounters 63%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 52 encounters 62%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 51 encounters 61%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 50 encounters 58%

vs Invoker Morgana 46 encounters 59%

vs Emerald Morgana 44 encounters 45%

vs Greenfather Amumu 42 encounters 50%

vs Invoker Ahri 36 encounters 75%

vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 35 encounters 57%

vs Solar Kayle 32 encounters 56%

vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 32 encounters 75%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 31 encounters 77%

vs Greenfather Morgana 30 encounters 57%

vs Greenfather Sentinel 30 encounters 57%

Board variants

Baseline

3.01 avg placement

→

2.73 avg placement

→

5.50 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.01 avg placement · 134 games

+1 unit (10 total)

Alune 2.73 avg placement · 11 games

Taric 2.60 avg placement · 5 games

Kennen 2.67 avg placement · 3 games

Brambleback 2.00 avg placement · 3 games

Elder Dragon 2.50 avg placement · 2 games

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.