What tier is Inferno Sivir on TFT Set 18?

Inferno Sivir is currently Tier A on TFT Set 18, with a 4.24 average placement and 52% top 4 rate over 246 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Inferno Sivir= 0.17

Level 9

Sample confidence: Low (246 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

4.24

Top 4

52%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~62 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Inferno 5/7

Hunter 2/3

Primal 2/4

Juggernaut 2/4

Defender 2/4

Ravager 1/2

Adaptor 1/2

Rapidfire 1/2

Executioner 1/2

Fae 1/2

Blossom 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Sivir

Combo	Avg placement
	5.71
	4.11
	6.25
	6.00
	2.33
	2.40
	2.80
	4.50
	3.75
	6.25

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW SLY Voltariux#EUW CHALLENGER 1266 LP 1

EUW Tsundere DeinaL#EUW CHALLENGER 950 LP 1

EUW Lloydd#237 CHALLENGER 829 LP 1

NA grea#melt CHALLENGER 801 LP 1

NA ACAD wasian#NA2 CHALLENGER 799 LP 1

NA Kiting is Hard#NA1 CHALLENGER 757 LP 1

NA Jjchen101#101 CHALLENGER 727 LP 1

NA ROC Lilbear#1122 CHALLENGER 692 LP 1

BR Quintanilha#1919 CHALLENGER 1701 LP 1

BR Lefeco#br1 CHALLENGER 741 LP 1

BR sakishow#may CHALLENGER 628 LP 1

BR Anklam#br1 GRANDMASTER 353 LP 1

BR Erith#BR1 GRANDMASTER 254 LP 1

KR NAVI Jip pok#navi CHALLENGER 1409 LP 1

KR 팔차선 꼬봉#KR1 CHALLENGER 1298 LP 1

KR 세훈에몽#KR11 CHALLENGER 1085 LP 1

KR 챌린저 문단속#KR1 CHALLENGER 987 LP 1

KR coldplay#1105 CHALLENGER 917 LP 1

EUW MIH ToonTv#MIH CHALLENGER 966 LP 2

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 106 encounters 53%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 65 encounters 65%

vs Caustic Nidalee 52 encounters 50%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 50 encounters 66%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 45 encounters 42%

vs Summoner Zyra 37 encounters 54%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 35 encounters 46%

vs Invoker Morgana 35 encounters 49%

vs Emerald Morgana 34 encounters 50%

vs Invoker Ahri 33 encounters 64%

vs Greenfather Sentinel 31 encounters 52%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 28 encounters 75%

vs Emerald Ahri 28 encounters 43%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 27 encounters 63%

vs Executioner Soraka 27 encounters 52%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 25 encounters 60%

vs Greenfather Morgana 24 encounters 58%

vs Greenfather Amumu 24 encounters 46%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 23 encounters 43%

vs Summoner Soraka 22 encounters 64%

Board variants

Baseline

4.23 avg placement

→

3.56 avg placement

→

5.00 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.