Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
3.50 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
5.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
4.00 |
|
1.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.75 |
|
4.20 |
|
3.00 |
|
2.50 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
5.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
5.33 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.27 |
|
3.25 |
|
1.50 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.33 |
|
5.00 |
|
5.33 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Haze#131
GRANDMASTER
435 LP
1
EUW
oskuu#EUW
MASTER
289 LP
1
EUW
Brising#SNG
GRANDMASTER
217 LP
1
NA
wyft#na123
GRANDMASTER
187 LP
1
NA
FL Upsetmax#NA2
MASTER
86 LP
1
KR
si9n#KR1
GRANDMASTER
339 LP
1
KR
빨리지기#KR1
GRANDMASTER
222 LP
1
BR
Kawori#idfc
MASTER
31 LP
2
EUW
ViggoZe#EUW
CHALLENGER
929 LP
3
EUW
shreddin#EUWU
GRANDMASTER
371 LP
3
EUW
pepoglad#333
GRANDMASTER
281 LP
3
NA
techzz#brrr
MASTER
131 LP
3
KR
My Paradise#KR1
CHALLENGER
926 LP
4
KR
팔차선 꼬봉#KR1
GRANDMASTER
373 LP
4
KR
티 모#2048
MASTER
192 LP
4
BR
Dklein#GUILD
MASTER
40 LP
5
KR
고려헬스클럽#KR1
GRANDMASTER
243 LP
5
NA
Chuyen2311#NA1
GRANDMASTER
321 LP
6
KR
Miss The Rage#TFT
CHALLENGER
528 LP
7
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
26% of games
2.00 avg placement
16% of games
4.35 avg placement
8% of games
1.33 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 8 units
2.00 avg placement · 27 games
+1 unit (9 total)
Gnar
1.33 avg placement · 9 games
Lux
1.00 avg placement · 3 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.