Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.45 |
|
4.76 |
|
4.38 |
|
4.21 |
|
4.83 |
|
4.30 |
|
4.29 |
|
6.00 |
|
4.33 |
|
3.80 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
5.31 |
|
5.71 |
|
2.83 |
|
4.33 |
|
5.50 |
|
4.80 |
|
5.20 |
|
3.80 |
|
3.00 |
|
4.50 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.63 |
|
3.82 |
|
5.12 |
|
5.25 |
|
3.53 |
|
4.33 |
|
3.22 |
|
5.75 |
|
5.86 |
|
3.43 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
GodL Rykomastery#GodL
GRANDMASTER
446 LP
1
NA
DINOSAUR#NUGZ
MASTER
139 LP
1
KR
난 슬플때 풀캠을 돌아#매일매일
GRANDMASTER
452 LP
1
KR
치지직 칸#1229
GRANDMASTER
382 LP
1
KR
새 벽#SOOP
GRANDMASTER
230 LP
1
EUW
Kojnid#AUT
CHALLENGER
568 LP
2
EUW
Ken Kitade#Kash
MASTER
267 LP
2
NA
ACAD wasian#NA2
GRANDMASTER
278 LP
2
NA
shoma#INT1
MASTER
273 LP
2
BR
FOUR Uaiti#br1
MASTER
211 LP
2
KR
pad0#파 도
GRANDMASTER
321 LP
2
EUW
whyyoumadpro#EUW
CHALLENGER
1053 LP
3
EUW
whyyoumadpro#EUW
CHALLENGER
1053 LP
3
EUW
shreddin#EUWU
GRANDMASTER
371 LP
3
EUW
Ken Kitade#Kash
MASTER
267 LP
3
NA
MJS Deleted#NA2
GRANDMASTER
242 LP
3
NA
MJS Deleted#NA2
GRANDMASTER
242 LP
3
NA
Kiting is Hard#NA1
MASTER
226 LP
3
NA
弈梦 小飞#2025
MASTER
74 LP
3
BR
ego illusions#ego
CHALLENGER
739 LP
3
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
6% of games
4.95 avg placement
5% of games
4.59 avg placement
3% of games
5.70 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
1.80 avg placement · 5 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.