BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Vanguard Elise Reroll▼ 0.95

Level 8
Placement
4.79
Top 4
41%
Contest.
78

This comp was Tier C in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 14), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Rakan
EmblemCoven
Elise
GuinsoosRagebladeArchangelsStaffTitansResolve
Hecarim
WarmogsArmorGargoyleStoneplateDragonsClaw
Diana
HandOfJusticeJeweledGauntletThiefsGloves
Sentinel
Morgana
EmblemVanguard
Aphelios
Taric
Alune

Traits

Vanguard Vanguard 6
Lunar Lunar 3/4
Invoker Invoker 2/3
Attuned Attuned 1
Emerald Aspect Emerald Aspect 1
Coven Coven 2/3
Elderwood Elderwood 1/3
Ravager Ravager 1/2
Rapidfire Rapidfire 1/2
Juggernaut Juggernaut 1/2
Riftbeast Riftbeast 1/3
Fae Fae 1/2
Spellweaver Spellweaver 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Elise
Elise
ComboAvg placement
ArchangelsStaffGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
4.69
EmblemSlayerGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
3.71
ArchangelsStaffGuinsoosRagebladeHandOfJustice
5.50
ArchangelsStaffEmblemSlayerGuinsoosRageblade
3.50
ArchangelsStaffArchangelsStaffGuinsoosRageblade
3.50
GuinsoosRagebladeGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
5.00
GargoyleStoneplateGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
3.50
ArchangelsStaffBloodthirsterGuinsoosRageblade
3.50
BloodthirsterGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
6.00
ArchangelsStaffGargoyleStoneplateGuinsoosRageblade
5.50
Hecarim
Hecarim
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
5.40
GargoyleStoneplateSunfireCapeWarmogsArmor
3.75
DragonsClawProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
4.75
GargoyleStoneplateSteadfastHeartWarmogsArmor
7.50
GargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
4.50
ProtectorsVowSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
5.50
DragonsClawSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
7.00
Diana
Diana
ComboAvg placement
HandOfJusticeJeweledGauntletStrikersFlail
4.60
ProtectorsVowStrikersFlailThiefsGloves
4.50

Seen on the TOP ladders

KR 서은지#롤좀하는가 CHALLENGER 835 LP 5
NA JukeYou#NA1 CHALLENGER 653 LP 6
NA yoni#7601 CHALLENGER 620 LP 8
KR 오타쿠#aaa CHALLENGER 1327 LP 8
KR 서은지#롤좀하는가 CHALLENGER 835 LP 8

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 21 encounters 48%
vs Summoner Zyra 19 encounters 21%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 17 encounters 24%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 15 encounters 47%
vs Caustic Nidalee 13 encounters 23%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 11 encounters 18%
vs Greenfather Amumu 11 encounters 64%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 11 encounters 27%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 10 encounters 20%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 9 encounters 22%
vs Invoker Morgana 8 encounters 62%
vs Executioner Ezreal 8 encounters 0%
vs Emerald Ahri 7 encounters 29%
vs Solar Kayle 7 encounters 43%
vs Fae Tristana 7 encounters 29%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 6 encounters 33%
vs Rival Kha'Zix 6 encounters 67%
vs Emerald Morgana 6 encounters 17%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 6 encounters 17%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 6 encounters 33%

Board variants

ApheliosDianaEliseHecarimMorganaRakanSentinel
Baseline
3% of games 6.00 avg placement
CamilleDianaEliseHecarimMorganaRakanSentinel
Aphelios
→
Camille
2% of games 5.00 avg placement
ApheliosDianaEliseHecarimMorganaRakanSentinelTaric
→
Taric
1% of games 6.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 2.00 avg placement · 2 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.