Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.80 |
|
1.75 |
|
3.00 |
|
3.67 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.67 |
|
4.00 |
|
1.67 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.00 |
|
5.00 |
|
1.14 |
|
1.71 |
|
2.83 |
|
3.80 |
|
4.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.33 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Kezman22#EUW
GRANDMASTER
442 LP
1
EUW
Haze#131
GRANDMASTER
435 LP
1
NA
dpei#NA1
GRANDMASTER
356 LP
1
NA
CTG dankmemes01#001
GRANDMASTER
287 LP
1
NA
RYT Shaco#NA1
MASTER
168 LP
1
KR
빈 틈#123
CHALLENGER
645 LP
1
KR
Ssangyeop#1234
CHALLENGER
626 LP
1
KR
실력과운#본캐임
GRANDMASTER
481 LP
1
KR
Teukhan#KR1
MASTER
254 LP
1
EUW
para#liv
MASTER
235 LP
2
EUW
Garkes#EUW
MASTER
150 LP
2
NA
Cheche#tefet
GRANDMASTER
303 LP
2
KR
The Smile#겸댕뿌잉
CHALLENGER
820 LP
2
KR
Teukhan#KR1
MASTER
254 LP
2
KR
바이언뮐러#KR1
MASTER
186 LP
2
KR
실력과운#본캐임
GRANDMASTER
481 LP
3
KR
키리기리#kiri
GRANDMASTER
205 LP
3
NA
CTG Marcel P#NA2
GRANDMASTER
387 LP
4
KR
Jesus Loves You#쵸볼때까지
GRANDMASTER
335 LP
4
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
40% of games
2.64 avg placement
6% of games
2.60 avg placement
6% of games
3.60 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 8 units
2.64 avg placement · 33 games
+1 unit (9 total)
Gnar
1.50 avg placement · 2 games
Alistar
1.00 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.