What tier is Battlemage Nidalee on TFT Set 18?

Battlemage Nidalee is currently Tier HM on TFT Set 18, with a 4.56 average placement and 49% top 4 rate over 496 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Battlemage Nidalee= 0.17

Level 9

Placement

4.56

Top 4

49%

Contest.

This comp was Tier C in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 23), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~82 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Hunter 3/4

Riftbeast 3/5

Adaptor 2/3

Primal 2/4

Invoker 2/3

Brawler 2/4

Blackthorn 2/4

Monolith 1

Caustic 1

Vanguard 1/2

Blossom 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Malphite

Combo	Avg placement
	3.96
	4.77
	3.86
	4.67
	4.30
	3.71
	5.00
	3.80
	3.56
	3.25

Nidalee

Combo	Avg placement
	4.29
	4.22
	3.75
	3.69
	5.50
	4.07
	5.00
	3.08
	4.36
	4.46

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW br0ken99#HR1 CHALLENGER 990 LP 1

NA Luqun#NA1 CHALLENGER 707 LP 1

NA big fish#1517 CHALLENGER 634 LP 1

BR TFT DANDAN#DANN CHALLENGER 709 LP 1

BR HIGH Hatsu#3030 CHALLENGER 508 LP 1

EUW M8 Jedusor#12345 CHALLENGER 1350 LP 2

EUW Settios#ABBA CHALLENGER 886 LP 2

EUW JustJohnny#tft CHALLENGER 865 LP 2

EUW Lumperich007#EUW CHALLENGER 691 LP 2

NA Chuyen2311#NA1 CHALLENGER 881 LP 2

NA 4kaden#pee CHALLENGER 780 LP 2

BR Bapzera#BR4 CHALLENGER 1936 LP 2

BR JuanGhurkas#Doom CHALLENGER 1341 LP 2

KR 도사 삼#LHN CHALLENGER 892 LP 2

EUW Settios#ABBA CHALLENGER 886 LP 3

NA VOIDS1N#NA1 CHALLENGER 859 LP 3

BR HIGH Hatsu#3030 CHALLENGER 508 LP 3

BR BrunooPRO#RAGE GRANDMASTER 321 LP 3

EUW TTV KatsutaxD#TFT CHALLENGER 1454 LP 4

EUW Cackleprikelcakl#EUWW CHALLENGER 1023 LP 4

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 40 encounters 50%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 24 encounters 50%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 23 encounters 39%

vs Summoner Zyra 21 encounters 71%

vs Caustic Nidalee 16 encounters 44%

vs Executioner Zyra 15 encounters 20%

vs Emerald Morgana 14 encounters 14%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 13 encounters 31%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 13 encounters 62%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 12 encounters 33%

vs FloraFatalis Soraka 12 encounters 67%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 12 encounters 50%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 12 encounters 50%

vs Summoner Soraka 12 encounters 58%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 11 encounters 27%

vs Invoker Morgana 11 encounters 18%

vs Emerald Ahri 10 encounters 70%

vs Executioner Soraka 10 encounters 40%

vs Greenfather Ahri 10 encounters 10%

vs Battlemage Sivir 9 encounters 67%

Board variants

Baseline

5.66 avg placement

→

3.20 avg placement

→

5.31 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.20 avg placement · 46 games

+1 unit (10 total)

Taric 1.89 avg placement · 9 games

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.