What tier is Executioner Zyra on TFT Set 18?

Executioner Zyra is currently Tier S on TFT Set 18, with a 3.92 average placement and 62% top 4 rate over 371 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Executioner Zyra= 0.11

Level 9

Sample confidence: Medium (371 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.92

Top 4

62%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~64 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Executioner 4

Summoner 3

Juggernaut 2/4

Inferno 2/3

Blackthorn 2/4

Flora Fatalis 2

Monolith 1

Thornmaiden 1

Elderwood 1/3

Defender 1/2

Spellweaver 1/2

Blossom 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Zyra

Combo	Avg placement
	3.63
	3.58
	3.69
	4.08
	3.33
	5.09
	3.00
	2.86
	3.14
	5.00

Soraka

Combo	Avg placement
	3.88
	2.88
	3.20
	2.50

Malphite

Combo	Avg placement
	4.18
	3.86
	4.06
	3.50
	3.62
	2.83
	4.90
	4.80
	2.43
	3.83

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW OTTO#aras CHALLENGER 1032 LP 1

EUW Garkes#EUW CHALLENGER 861 LP 1

EUW Vatiii x3#EUW CHALLENGER 723 LP 1

NA panche3e#plink CHALLENGER 1270 LP 1

NA Ashemoo#XDD CHALLENGER 755 LP 1

BR manu#ivy CHALLENGER 702 LP 1

BR sakishow#may CHALLENGER 628 LP 1

EUW Garkes#EUW CHALLENGER 861 LP 2

NA VIT k3soju#000 CHALLENGER 782 LP 2

NA inflames#TFT CHALLENGER 722 LP 2

NA Crushings#NA1 CHALLENGER 714 LP 2

NA LC Laharl#3836 CHALLENGER 684 LP 2

BR Corinthians#TFT CHALLENGER 875 LP 2

BR Midoriya#midu GRANDMASTER 520 LP 2

KR 팔차선 꼬봉#KR1 CHALLENGER 1298 LP 2

KR 요리왕짬뽕달#KR 1 CHALLENGER 907 LP 2

EUW whyyoumadpro#EUW CHALLENGER 866 LP 3

EUW SXY DirtyDog#TFT CHALLENGER 843 LP 3

EUW Princess Lele#ART CHALLENGER 841 LP 3

NA LC Dominus#CAPO CHALLENGER 618 LP 3

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 163 encounters 53%

vs Caustic Nidalee 89 encounters 51%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 88 encounters 62%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 85 encounters 66%

vs Emerald Ahri 65 encounters 55%

vs Emerald Morgana 60 encounters 43%

vs Invoker Ahri 59 encounters 64%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 54 encounters 50%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 54 encounters 61%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 51 encounters 63%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 50 encounters 50%

vs Greenfather Amumu 49 encounters 57%

vs Summoner Zyra 49 encounters 73%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 48 encounters 65%

vs Greenfather Sentinel 45 encounters 64%

vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 43 encounters 53%

vs Invoker Morgana 40 encounters 62%

vs Greenfather Morgana 36 encounters 33%

vs Spellweaver Veigar 35 encounters 77%

vs Greenfather Ahri 34 encounters 47%

Board variants

Baseline

5.20 avg placement

→

3.40 avg placement

→

5.25 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.40 avg placement · 37 games

+1 unit (10 total)

Lux 1.67 avg placement · 3 games

Ivern 1.33 avg placement · 3 games

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.