BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Coven Cassiopeia= 0.13

Level 8
Placement
5.83
Top 4
27%
Contest.
90

This comp was Tier C in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 22), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Camille
BloodthirsterTitansResolveEdgeOfNight
Elise
GargoyleStoneplateWarmogsArmorSpiritVisage
Caitlyn
Cassiopeia
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinArchangelsStaff
Diana
EmblemCoven
Hecarim
Fiddlesticks
Morgana
Sentinel

Traits

Coven Coven 5/7
Vanguard Vanguard 4/6
Ravager Ravager 2/4
Invoker Invoker 2/3
Spellweaver Spellweaver 2/4
Flora Fatalis Flora Fatalis 1/2
Elderwood Elderwood 1/3
Hunter Hunter 1/2
Riftbeast Riftbeast 1/3
Lunar Lunar 1/2
Defender Defender 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Camille
Camille
ComboAvg placement
BloodthirsterEdgeOfNightTitansResolve
5.50
Elise
Elise
ComboAvg placement
GargoyleStoneplateSpiritVisageWarmogsArmor
5.38
GargoyleStoneplateGuinsoosRagebladeTitansResolve
5.00
GargoyleStoneplateSunfireCapeWarmogsArmor
6.67
Cassiopeia
Cassiopeia
ComboAvg placement
HextechGunbladeJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
6.27
ArchangelsStaffBlueBuffJeweledGauntlet
6.75
BlueBuffHextechGunbladeJeweledGauntlet
6.57
ArchangelsStaffJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
4.33
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinVoidStaff
6.80
ArchangelsStaffHextechGunbladeJeweledGauntlet
5.80
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
6.25
ArchangelsStaffArchangelsStaffHextechGunblade
5.75
EmblemInvokerJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
6.25
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
6.25

Seen on the TOP ladders

BR Teteuso10#BR1 GRANDMASTER 480 LP 2
NA ralphie#maha CHALLENGER 1131 LP 3
BR flewaay217893788#061 CHALLENGER 734 LP 6
BR koke#four GRANDMASTER 513 LP 8
KR Gambler#RU6 CHALLENGER 838 LP 8

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 31 encounters 26%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 20 encounters 35%
vs Elderwood Ezreal 17 encounters 35%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 16 encounters 19%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 15 encounters 33%
vs Caustic Nidalee 14 encounters 36%
vs Emerald Ahri 13 encounters 31%
vs Emerald Morgana 12 encounters 25%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 11 encounters 27%
vs Executioner Ezreal 10 encounters 20%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 10 encounters 40%
vs Greenfather Amumu 9 encounters 22%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 9 encounters 33%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 9 encounters 44%
vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 8 encounters 38%
vs Juggernaut Sivir 7 encounters 29%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 7 encounters 43%
vs Blackthorn Yunara 7 encounters 29%
vs Executioner Soraka 7 encounters 29%
vs Executioner Azir 7 encounters 43%

Board variants

CaitlynCamilleCassiopeiaDianaEliseHecarimMorganaSentinel
Baseline
5% of games 6.20 avg placement
AluneCaitlynCamilleCassiopeiaDianaEliseMorganaSentinel
Hecarim
→
Alune
2% of games 4.83 avg placement
CaitlynCamilleCassiopeiaDianaEliseFiddlesticksMorgana
HecarimSentinel
→
Fiddlesticks
2% of games 5.80 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Incomplete attempts grouped here

Caitlyn Coven Caitlyn 7 units 295 games · 5.80 avg placement
Elise Coven Elise 8 units 37 games · 6.57 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.