Full composition
Traits
Elderwood6/7
Rapidfire2/3
Vanguard2/4
Brawler2/4
Fae2/4
Lunar2/3
Defender2/4
Ravager1/2
Sprykin1/3
Executioner1/2
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.80 |
|
4.20 |
|
6.75 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
3.90 |
|
4.11 |
|
5.74 |
|
4.67 |
|
2.62 |
|
6.10 |
|
3.56 |
|
4.11 |
|
5.56 |
|
5.67 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
NA
iCeEmperoz#minH
CHALLENGER
605 LP
1
NA
title#1951
GRANDMASTER
427 LP
1
BR
fsn#BR2
MASTER
122 LP
1
BR
Hop#TFT3
MASTER
0 LP
1
KR
강선종#KR1
CHALLENGER
555 LP
1
EUW
KlicorneN#4444
GRANDMASTER
304 LP
2
EUW
Spoti#2137
MASTER
244 LP
2
EUW
SXY DirtyDog#TFT
MASTER
219 LP
2
NA
FL Upsetmax#NA2
MASTER
86 LP
2
BR
To de atestado#0101
GRANDMASTER
308 LP
2
KR
체스용#5174
MASTER
294 LP
2
KR
종 범#TFT
MASTER
236 LP
2
EUW
Spoti#2137
MASTER
244 LP
3
KR
삼 디#KR2
CHALLENGER
612 LP
3
KR
낭만술통#KR1
GRANDMASTER
438 LP
3
KR
Stily#KR1
GRANDMASTER
332 LP
3
KR
175 65 18#KR1
GRANDMASTER
180 LP
3
EUW
pepoglad#333
GRANDMASTER
281 LP
4
EUW
TeilzeitKönig#EUW
GRANDMASTER
258 LP
4
NA
corduroy#euhh
MASTER
110 LP
4
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
15% of games
5.64 avg placement
5% of games
5.94 avg placement
5% of games
6.61 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
1.75 avg placement · 4 games
+2 units (11 total)
Kennen + Lux
1.00 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.