Full composition
Traits
Juggernaut
2/4
Inferno
2/3
Vanguard
2/4
Avatar
1
Bounty Seeker
1
Old Growth
1
Apex Predator
1
Emerald Aspect
1
Riftbeast
2/3
Hunter
1/2
Invoker
1/2
Executioner
1/2
Blossom
1/3
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
3.67 |
|
5.67 |
|
1.50 |
|
7.00 |
|
5.00 |
|
2.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.50 |
|
3.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
G1nkgo#2002
CHALLENGER
1029 LP
1
EUW
Lloydd#237
CHALLENGER
829 LP
1
NA
grea#melt
CHALLENGER
801 LP
1
KR
삼 디#KR2
CHALLENGER
1322 LP
1
KR
simjoo#2330
CHALLENGER
1023 LP
1
KR
pad0#파 도
CHALLENGER
943 LP
1
KR
리 키#4080
CHALLENGER
907 LP
1
EUW
Climber#2137
CHALLENGER
703 LP
2
EUW
i miss thex#prime
CHALLENGER
697 LP
2
NA
Dasxly#TTV
CHALLENGER
874 LP
2
KR
abcdef#0423
CHALLENGER
933 LP
2
KR
재스이#123
CHALLENGER
849 LP
2
EUW
FIN0HAN#EUWW
CHALLENGER
732 LP
3
EUW
FIN0HAN#EUWW
CHALLENGER
732 LP
3
NA
Darth Nub#NA2
CHALLENGER
925 LP
6
EUW
Lloydd#237
CHALLENGER
829 LP
7
NA
Chuyen2311#NA1
CHALLENGER
881 LP
7
NA
VOIDS1N#NA1
CHALLENGER
859 LP
8
KR
오박사#Dr OH
CHALLENGER
988 LP
8
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
8% of games
2.89 avg placement
5% of games
5.17 avg placement
4% of games
3.50 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.