Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
7.67 |
|
8.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.09 |
|
2.56 |
|
3.56 |
|
2.67 |
|
7.00 |
|
6.00 |
|
4.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
|
7.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
6.67 |
|
8.00 |
|
2.00 |
|
4.00 |
|
3.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Phos#EU123
GRANDMASTER
459 LP
1
EUW
TeilzeitKönig#EUW
GRANDMASTER
258 LP
1
EUW
SXY DirtyDog#TFT
MASTER
219 LP
1
EUW
Lloydd#237
GRANDMASTER
213 LP
1
NA
metzauh#1767
GRANDMASTER
318 LP
1
NA
EBIC GAMER#NA1
MASTER
181 LP
1
NA
Kyouko Hori#NA1
MASTER
179 LP
1
NA
Kyouko Hori#NA1
MASTER
179 LP
1
KR
Stily#KR1
GRANDMASTER
332 LP
1
KR
Ssangyeop#1234
CHALLENGER
626 LP
2
KR
새 벽#SOOP
GRANDMASTER
230 LP
2
NA
Chuyen2311#NA1
GRANDMASTER
321 LP
3
EUW
MilkYippie#9840
MASTER
231 LP
4
EUW
drum n bass#lol
MASTER
156 LP
4
NA
mali QAQ#Ornn
MASTER
97 LP
4
EUW
SLY Voltariux#EUW
GRANDMASTER
336 LP
6
NA
ACAD wasian#NA2
GRANDMASTER
278 LP
6
EUW
MilkYippie#9840
MASTER
231 LP
7
NA
KBM Toddy#tftbr
GRANDMASTER
233 LP
7
KR
쌀 거 같아#자기야
GRANDMASTER
257 LP
7
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
38% of games
3.15 avg placement
3% of games
1.50 avg placement
2% of games
1.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
3.15 avg placement · 46 games
+1 unit (10 total)
Sentinel
1.50 avg placement · 4 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.