What tier is Rival Nidalee Slow 7 on TFT Set 18?

Rival Nidalee Slow 7 is currently Tier A on TFT Set 18, with a 3.96 average placement and 62% top 4 rate over 136 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Rival Nidalee Slow 7▲ 0.34

Level 8

Sample confidence: Low (136 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.96

Top 4

62%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Se poser au niveau 7 pour rerolls Rengar, Vi, Master Yi

Niveau qui minimise l'or nécessaire pour 3-coût(s) en même temps. Compter environ 158-214 or pour une chance de 25% à 75% d'obtenir toutes les copies visées (médiane ~184 or).

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Adaptor 3/4

Blossom 3/5

Primal 2/4

Juggernaut 2/4

Brawler 2/4

Rival 1/2

Caustic 1

Invoker 1/2

Riftbeast 1/3

Summoner 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Combo	Avg placement
	3.60
	4.75
	3.67
	4.67
	3.00
	2.00
	1.50
	4.50
	4.00

Rengar

Combo	Avg placement
	3.24
	3.80
	3.50
	3.00
	3.50
	2.00
	5.00
	2.50

Nidalee

Combo	Avg placement
	3.54
	4.20
	4.33
	2.67
	2.00
	3.00
	5.50
	4.50
	5.50
	3.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

BR Sr Kapiroto#LEITE MASTER 263 LP 1

EUW Settios#ABBA CHALLENGER 886 LP 2

BR santojamaicano#777 CHALLENGER 600 LP 2

BR sagedesempregada#twtch GRANDMASTER 375 LP 2

BR Nobunarga#Oda GRANDMASTER 277 LP 2

KR 귤 임#귤 임 CHALLENGER 798 LP 2

NA ralphie#maha CHALLENGER 1131 LP 3

BR Bapzera#BR4 CHALLENGER 1936 LP 3

NA Dreynox#NA1 CHALLENGER 730 LP 5

BR deka#tftgg GRANDMASTER 364 LP 5

EUW mp1#EUW2 CHALLENGER 1203 LP 6

NA sistemi burgije#NA1 CHALLENGER 799 LP 7

NA WutPu#moc CHALLENGER 649 LP 7

BR Lionel Messi#BeTo GRANDMASTER 491 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 59 encounters 53%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 38 encounters 55%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 31 encounters 65%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 29 encounters 72%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 27 encounters 63%

vs Caustic Nidalee 26 encounters 50%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 25 encounters 40%

vs Emerald Ahri 24 encounters 62%

vs Summoner Zyra 24 encounters 71%

vs Emerald Morgana 19 encounters 37%

vs Summoner Soraka 18 encounters 72%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 17 encounters 59%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 16 encounters 62%

vs Greenfather Amumu 16 encounters 19%

vs Invoker Morgana 14 encounters 57%

vs Executioner Soraka 14 encounters 57%

vs Executioner Ezreal 14 encounters 43%

vs Fae Tristana 13 encounters 69%

vs Juggernaut Sivir 13 encounters 77%

vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 13 encounters 46%

Board variants

Baseline

5.54 avg placement

→

2.88 avg placement

→

2.91 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 8 units 2.88 avg placement · 17 games

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.