BrokenMeta.gg
Teamfight Tactics League of Legends
FR EN
A
TFT Set 18

Solar Yunara Reroll▲ 0.65

Level 8
Sample confidence: Medium (371 games). See how this is calculated →
Placement
4.13
Top 4
55%
Contest.
92

Full composition

Yorick
SunfireCapeSpiritVisageProtectorsVow
Leona
WarmogsArmorThiefsGlovesGargoyleStoneplate
Karma
Sejuani
Yunara
SpearOfShojinLastWhisperDeathblade
Kayle
LeBlanc
EmblemExecutioner
Azir

Traits

Solar Solar 3
Blossom Blossom 3/5
Juggernaut Juggernaut 2/4
Executioner Executioner 2/3
Spellweaver Spellweaver 2/4
Summoner Summoner 2/3
Elderwood Elderwood 1/3
Rapidfire Rapidfire 1/2
Blackthorn Blackthorn 1/2
Defender Defender 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Yorick
Yorick
ComboAvg placement
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapThiefsGloves
5.00
JeweledGauntletKrakensFuryThiefsGloves
2.50
Yunara
Yunara
ComboAvg placement
DeathbladeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
4.07
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
3.50
LastWhisperSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
3.32
GiantSlayerLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
4.07
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
3.79
DeathbladeSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
3.89
DeathbladeGiantSlayerSpearOfShojin
4.00
DeathbladeDeathbladeSpearOfShojin
3.86
Artifact_GoldCollectorLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
4.17
HextechGunbladeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
5.50

Seen on the TOP ladders

BR LeuzZoka#TFT CHALLENGER 675 LP 1
BR Kaiser#23135 GRANDMASTER 390 LP 1
BR awwent#9002 MASTER 135 LP 1
KR 팔차선 꼬봉#KR1 CHALLENGER 934 LP 1
KR Chun Gum#천 검 CHALLENGER 916 LP 1
KR dunizuni#ema50 CHALLENGER 822 LP 1
EUW KimChaewon676767#NERV CHALLENGER 572 LP 2
NA EricWei#1412 CHALLENGER 760 LP 2
BR Léozin do TFT#BR1 MASTER 183 LP 2
EUW MKOI ODESZA#000 CHALLENGER 691 LP 3
NA title#1951 CHALLENGER 655 LP 3
KR 클레스메이트#KR1 CHALLENGER 724 LP 3
EUW Kezman22#EUW CHALLENGER 783 LP 4
EUW MKOI ODESZA#000 CHALLENGER 691 LP 4
KR 강선종#KR1 CHALLENGER 1419 LP 4
KR KAST#KR1 CHALLENGER 765 LP 4
EUW SLY Voltariux#EUW CHALLENGER 889 LP 5
BR DETETIVE ALINE#DYLON CHALLENGER 482 LP 5
KR 토라오니#253 CHALLENGER 707 LP 5
KR 치지직 칸#1229 CHALLENGER 627 LP 5

Matchups vs

vs Greenfather Ezreal 136 encounters 44%
vs Caustic Aphelios 131 encounters 61%
vs Greenfather Amumu 92 encounters 47%
vs Summoner Zyra 75 encounters 56%
vs Battlemage Sivir 75 encounters 51%
vs Caustic Nidalee 69 encounters 68%
vs Greenfather Sentinel 66 encounters 45%
vs Emerald Ahri 56 encounters 50%
vs Summoner Soraka 48 encounters 75%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 46 encounters 50%
vs Spellweaver Veigar 42 encounters 52%
vs Invoker Morgana 42 encounters 57%
vs Blossom Ahri 39 encounters 56%
vs Emerald Morgana 36 encounters 53%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 36 encounters 47%
vs Greenfather Sivir 34 encounters 38%
vs Invoker Ahri 32 encounters 53%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 31 encounters 42%
vs Caustic Sivir 31 encounters 45%
vs Fae Tristana 31 encounters 52%

Board variants

AzirKarmaKayleLeBlancLeonaSejuaniYorickYunara
Baseline
34% of games 3.52 avg placement
KarmaKayleLeBlancLeonaSejuaniYorickYunara
Azir
29% of games 5.81 avg placement
KarmaKayleKennenLeBlancLeonaSejuaniYorickYunara
Azir
Kennen
4% of games 3.33 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 8 units 3.52 avg placement · 128 games
+1 unit (9 total)
Kennen
Kennen 2.22 avg placement · 9 games
Ezreal
Ezreal 1.80 avg placement · 5 games
Malphite
Malphite 3.00 avg placement · 3 games
Soraka
Soraka 3.33 avg placement · 3 games
Lillia
Lillia 1.00 avg placement · 3 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.