What tier is Emerald Zyra on TFT Set 18?

Emerald Zyra is currently Tier A on TFT Set 18, with a 3.87 average placement and 67% top 4 rate over 117 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Emerald Zyra= 0.06

Level 9

Sample confidence: Low (117 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

3.87

Top 4

67%

Contest.

Full composition

Traits

Vanguard 4/6

Riftbeast 3/5

Ravager 2/4

Rapidfire 2/3

Lunar 2/3

Summoner 2/3

Thornmaiden 1

Emerald Aspect 1

Elderwood 1/3

Invoker 1/2

Juggernaut 1/2

Inferno 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Zyra

Combo	Avg placement
	2.40
	4.33
	3.33
	1.33
	6.00
	4.00
	7.00
	5.00
	2.00
	3.00

Sentinel

Combo	Avg placement
	2.75
	1.75
	4.00
	2.00
	7.00
	8.00

Aphelios

Combo	Avg placement
	3.00
	3.00
	3.67
	2.00
	4.67
	2.67
	4.00
	1.50
	2.50
	6.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW GodL Gobosteur#WTB CHALLENGER 888 LP 2

NA VIT k3soju#000 CHALLENGER 681 LP 2

BR eusouolucas#1212 CHALLENGER 1557 LP 4

BR Alberoni#TFT GRANDMASTER 240 LP 4

NA FW AQ1H#6406 CHALLENGER 643 LP 6

EUW ImpetuousPanda#TFT CHALLENGER 663 LP 7

NA CTG dankmemes01#001 CHALLENGER 845 LP 8

Matchups vs

vs Battlemage Sivir 39 encounters 59%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 32 encounters 50%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 21 encounters 62%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 20 encounters 60%

vs Caustic Aphelios 20 encounters 50%

vs Emerald Ahri 19 encounters 68%

vs Greenfather Amumu 19 encounters 21%

vs Summoner Soraka 17 encounters 76%

vs Invoker Ahri 17 encounters 82%

vs Summoner Zyra 17 encounters 71%

vs Blossom Ahri 16 encounters 88%

vs Greenfather Sentinel 16 encounters 12%

vs Solar Kayle 14 encounters 79%

vs Battlemage Nidalee 14 encounters 71%

vs Emerald Morgana 14 encounters 29%

vs Caustic Sivir 13 encounters 46%

vs Caustic Nidalee 13 encounters 85%

vs Greenfather Morgana 12 encounters 67%

vs Rival Rengar 12 encounters 67%

vs Rival Kha'Zix 11 encounters 73%

Board variants

Baseline

2.86 avg placement

→

2.70 avg placement

→

6.00 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.