BrokenMeta.gg
WoW: ForeverWoW: Forever Teamfight TacticsTFT League of LegendsLoL
FR EN
HM
TFT Set 18

Emerald Zyra▲ 0.34

Level 9
Placement
4.68
Top 4
50%
Contest.
82

This comp was Tier B in a previous refresh (last seen Sep 22), but doesn't get enough recent games to stay actively ranked this cycle. Kept here for reference.

Full composition

Diana
Mama Beak
EmblemExecutioner
Hecarim
SunfireCapeEvenshroudThiefsGloves
Zyra
SpearOfShojinRabadonsDeathcapJeweledGauntlet
Sentinel
GargoyleStoneplateProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
Aphelios
Brambleback
EmblemRapidfire
Taric
Maokai

Traits

Vanguard Vanguard 4/6
Riftbeast Riftbeast 3/5
Ravager Ravager 2/4
Rapidfire Rapidfire 2/3
Lunar Lunar 2/3
Summoner Summoner 2/3
Old Growth Old Growth 1
Thornmaiden Thornmaiden 1
Emerald Aspect Emerald Aspect 1
Elderwood Elderwood 1/3
Invoker Invoker 1/2
Juggernaut Juggernaut 1/2

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Hecarim
Hecarim
ComboAvg placement
AdaptiveHelmBrambleVestIonicSpark
6.00
EvenshroudGargoyleStoneplateSunfireCape
6.00
Zyra
Zyra
ComboAvg placement
JeweledGauntletRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
3.60
JeweledGauntletSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
7.20
ArchangelsStaffJeweledGauntletSpearOfShojin
3.67
ArchangelsStaffArchangelsStaffJeweledGauntlet
2.67
RabadonsDeathcapRedBuffSpearOfShojin
6.33
GuinsoosRagebladeRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
6.50
JeweledGauntletNashorsToothRabadonsDeathcap
7.00
GiantSlayerRabadonsDeathcapSpearOfShojin
2.00
ArchangelsStaffGuinsoosRagebladeVoidStaff
7.00
MorellonomiconSpearOfShojinVoidStaff
6.00
Sentinel
Sentinel
ComboAvg placement
AdaptiveHelmProtectorsVowSpiritVisage
2.00
ProtectorsVowProtectorsVowWarmogsArmor
3.50
GargoyleStoneplateSunfireCapeWarmogsArmor
2.50
IonicSparkMorellonomiconThiefsGloves
8.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW GodL Gobosteur#WTB CHALLENGER 836 LP 2
NA Maple#Arrow CHALLENGER 822 LP 2
EUW Lumperich007#EUW CHALLENGER 691 LP 3
NA Kiyoon#NA2 CHALLENGER 856 LP 3
BR Gabymar10#br1 GRANDMASTER 281 LP 3
NA EricWei#1412 CHALLENGER 996 LP 5
BR Nobunarga#Oda GRANDMASTER 277 LP 6
KR 수 민#김정모 CHALLENGER 948 LP 6

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 23 encounters 57%
vs Juggernaut Zyra 20 encounters 40%
vs Caustic Nidalee 13 encounters 62%
vs Greenfather Amumu 13 encounters 15%
vs Summoner Zyra 13 encounters 54%
vs Executioner Soraka 11 encounters 64%
vs Emerald Morgana 10 encounters 40%
vs FloraFatalis Azir 10 encounters 50%
vs FloraFatalis Kha'Zix 9 encounters 89%
vs Summoner Azir 9 encounters 44%
vs Emerald Ahri 9 encounters 78%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 8 encounters 25%
vs Invoker Morgana 8 encounters 75%
vs Greenfather Sivir 8 encounters 25%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 7 encounters 57%
vs Blossom Ahri 7 encounters 71%
vs Fae Tristana 6 encounters 83%
vs Greenfather Ahri 6 encounters 17%
vs FloraFatalis Ezreal 6 encounters 67%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 6 encounters 33%

Board variants

ApheliosBramblebackDianaHecarimMama BeakSentinelTaricZyra
Baseline
12% of games 3.07 avg placement
AluneApheliosBramblebackDianaHecarimMama BeakSentinelTaricZyra
→
Alune
6% of games 2.00 avg placement
MaokaiMorganaScuttlecrabSentinelTaricVeigarViYorickZyra
ApheliosBramblebackDianaHecarimMama Beak
→
MaokaiMorganaScuttlecrabVeigarViYorick
2% of games 7.00 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.