What tier is Fae Sivir on TFT Set 18?

Fae Sivir is currently Tier B on TFT Set 18, with a 4.45 average placement and 50% top 4 rate over 107 real ranked games analyzed.

TFT Set 18

Fae Sivir= 0.30

Level 8

Sample confidence: Low (107 games). See how this is calculated →

Placement

4.45

Top 4

50%

Contest.

Full composition

Game Plan

Each step's detail is currently only generated in French.

Niveau 9, quelques rerolls suffisent

Aucun carry à 2-3★ dans cette compo : médiane ~66 or pour compléter le board.

These numbers assume a solo player with no contest from other players in the lobby. Real contest on these champions can make these estimates optimistic.

Traits

Hunter 3/4

Juggernaut 3/4

Fae 3/4

Defender 3/4

Primal 2/4

Inferno 2/3

Sprykin 2/3

Vanguard 1/2

Blossom 1/3

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Tristana

Combo	Avg placement
	1.20
	5.00
	5.50
	5.00

Sivir

Combo	Avg placement
	4.92
	3.73
	6.50
	4.80
	3.00
	4.80
	1.25
	5.33
	4.67
	5.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

BR Amor Fati#bby5 GRANDMASTER 273 LP 1

KR 만어리#만어리 CHALLENGER 1412 LP 1

KR 궁디궁딩#KR1 CHALLENGER 777 LP 1

BR Bapzera#BR4 CHALLENGER 1936 LP 2

BR HIGH GuiOliveira#0709 GRANDMASTER 459 LP 2

KR REDDICE#KR11 CHALLENGER 881 LP 3

KR 지구걸어#TFT CHALLENGER 863 LP 3

KR 북조선틱톡커진우#KR1 CHALLENGER 798 LP 3

NA Anx#TWICE CHALLENGER 757 LP 4

KR 너가 좀 알려줘#Chzzk CHALLENGER 940 LP 4

NA JukeYou#NA1 CHALLENGER 653 LP 5

EUW Rubic#1453 CHALLENGER 796 LP 6

BR deka#tftgg GRANDMASTER 364 LP 7

Matchups vs

vs Caustic Aphelios 39 encounters 59%

vs Juggernaut Zyra 37 encounters 43%

vs FloraFatalis Azir 28 encounters 57%

vs Summoner Zyra 25 encounters 68%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 23 encounters 39%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 19 encounters 47%

vs Caustic Nidalee 19 encounters 68%

vs Invoker Morgana 16 encounters 50%

vs Greenfather Morgana 15 encounters 33%

vs Emerald Morgana 14 encounters 36%

vs Emerald Ahri 13 encounters 54%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 13 encounters 54%

vs Blossom Ahri 12 encounters 58%

vs Executioner Soraka 12 encounters 42%

vs Summoner Soraka 12 encounters 50%

vs Greenfather Amumu 11 encounters 55%

vs Greenfather Ahri 10 encounters 60%

vs Greenfather Aphelios 10 encounters 20%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 10 encounters 70%

vs Rapidfire Aphelios 9 encounters 78%

Board variants

Baseline

3.50 avg placement

→

6.50 avg placement

→

2.00 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons

Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.