Greenfather Alistar= 0.18

Level 9

Placement

5.09

Top 4

44%

Contest.

Full composition

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Alistar

Combo	Avg placement
	6.00
	1.00

Ezreal

Combo	Avg placement
	2.00
	8.00
	7.00

Amumu

Combo	Avg placement
	8.00
	3.00
	7.00

Seen on the TOP ladders

KR 백승민#agent CHALLENGER 703 LP 1

NA J or C#NA1 GRANDMASTER 385 LP 3

KR 치지직 칸#1229 GRANDMASTER 382 LP 6

Matchups vs

vs Summoner Zyra 24 encounters 54%

vs Solar Kayle 15 encounters 60%

vs Summoner Soraka 12 encounters 58%

vs Greenfather Amumu 9 encounters 0%

vs Fae Tristana 9 encounters 33%

vs Defender Cassiopeia 9 encounters 22%

vs Riftbeast Cinderling 9 encounters 33%

vs Rival Kha'Zix 9 encounters 67%

vs Executioner Zyra 8 encounters 62%

vs Executioner Soraka 8 encounters 0%

vs Greenfather Ezreal 8 encounters 25%

vs Solar Xayah 7 encounters 43%

vs Emerald Aphelios 7 encounters 29%

vs Caustic Kog'Maw 7 encounters 57%

vs Battlemage Sivir 7 encounters 29%

vs FloraFatalis Teemo 6 encounters 0%

vs Rival Rengar 6 encounters 33%

vs Riftbeast Pebbles 5 encounters 0%

vs Elderwood Ezreal 5 encounters 60%

vs FloraFatalis Veigar 5 encounters 40%

Board variants

Baseline

4.89 avg placement

→

2.50 avg placement

→

4.00 avg placement

Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 4.89 avg placement · 9 games

+1 unit (10 total)

Lux 2.50 avg placement · 6 games

The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.