Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
3.12 |
|
3.56 |
|
3.00 |
|
2.00 |
|
2.40 |
|
6.75 |
|
5.00 |
|
3.00 |
|
1.50 |
|
4.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
2.54 |
|
2.80 |
|
5.80 |
|
1.20 |
|
3.75 |
|
4.75 |
|
1.75 |
|
4.00 |
|
3.33 |
|
4.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
M8 Jedusor#12345
GRANDMASTER
369 LP
1
EUW
Canbizz#EUW61
GRANDMASTER
256 LP
1
EUW
Robinsoneq#EUW
MASTER
180 LP
1
NA
ACAD Dishsoap#NA3
CHALLENGER
827 LP
1
KR
코끼리비스킷#KR1
GRANDMASTER
414 LP
1
EUW
GodL Rykomastery#GodL
GRANDMASTER
446 LP
2
EUW
MIH bensac#WTB
GRANDMASTER
418 LP
2
NA
EBIC GAMER#NA1
MASTER
181 LP
2
NA
FARTINATOR06#fart
MASTER
178 LP
2
EUW
Mujjiwaraa#EUW
MASTER
308 LP
3
EUW
etre infame#EUW
GRANDMASTER
221 LP
3
KR
새 벽#SOOP
GRANDMASTER
230 LP
3
KR
희 구#0825
MASTER
203 LP
3
KR
필통이#KR1
GRANDMASTER
190 LP
3
EUW
ViggoZe#EUW
CHALLENGER
929 LP
4
EUW
SXY BanaWest#SXY
GRANDMASTER
240 LP
4
NA
Jjchen101#101
MASTER
108 LP
4
EUW
SaucePan#EUW
MASTER
205 LP
5
NA
Kiting is Hard#NA1
MASTER
226 LP
5
KR
띵 땡#KR1
CHALLENGER
1115 LP
5
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
14% of games
3.52 avg placement
7% of games
5.40 avg placement
3% of games
1.20 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
+2 units (11 total)
Aphelios + Pebbles
1.00 avg placement · 2 games
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.