Full composition
Item combos — main carries (top 10)
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
4.00 |
|
6.00 |
| Combo | Avg placement |
|
6.80 |
|
6.20 |
|
5.20 |
|
6.80 |
|
5.00 |
|
7.33 |
|
4.00 |
|
7.00 |
|
7.50 |
|
2.00 |
Seen on the TOP ladders
EUW
Renekten#EUW
MASTER
250 LP
1
NA
META Spencer#TFT
MASTER
234 LP
2
NA
CTG robinsongz#888
CHALLENGER
547 LP
3
EUW
MKOI ODESZA#000
MASTER
366 LP
4
NA
Kyouko Hori#NA1
MASTER
179 LP
4
KR
LJW#KOR
GRANDMASTER
305 LP
4
KR
크 앙#HANAE
MASTER
219 LP
4
NA
VCLF9#kayle
GRANDMASTER
219 LP
6
BR
ego illusions#ego
CHALLENGER
739 LP
7
Matchups vs
Board variants
Baseline
6% of games
5.00 avg placement
5% of games
5.25 avg placement
5% of games
6.50 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.
Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)
Base board — 9 units
Not enough games with exactly this board, no add-ons
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.
Augment path
Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.