BrokenMeta.gg
FR EN
B

Caustic Sivir= 0.09

Level 8
Placement
4.80
Top 4
45%
Contest.
92

Full composition

Cinderling
Kog'Maw
RedBuffMorellonomiconThiefsGloves
Krug
Sivir
InfinityEdgeRedBuffSpearOfShojin
Nidalee
SteraksGageInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
Sentinel
Sett
Taric
Ashe

Item combos — main carries (top 10)

Sivir
Sivir
ComboAvg placement
InfinityEdgeRedBuffSpearOfShojin
3.59
InfinityEdgeRedBuffStrikersFlail
4.18
InfinityEdgeSpearOfShojinStrikersFlail
5.13
GiantSlayerInfinityEdgeRedBuff
4.42
GiantSlayerInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
5.00
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
3.91
DeathbladeInfinityEdgeRedBuff
3.09
BlueBuffInfinityEdgeRedBuff
5.33
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperSpearOfShojin
5.86
InfinityEdgeLastWhisperRedBuff
4.80
Nidalee
Nidalee
ComboAvg placement
InfinityEdgeSpearOfShojinSteraksGage
3.22
EdgeOfNightInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
3.89
EmblemHunterEmblemSlayerSpearOfShojin
2.25
InfinityEdgeQuicksilverSteraksGage
6.00
EdgeOfNightSpearOfShojinSteraksGage
4.50
EdgeOfNightEmblemHunterSteraksGage
4.60
EmblemHunterSpearOfShojinSteraksGage
4.40
InfinityEdgeSteraksGageSteraksGage
3.00
EdgeOfNightEmblemHunterInfinityEdge
3.20
EmblemHunterInfinityEdgeSpearOfShojin
2.75

Seen on the TOP ladders

EUW Hypno#6666 GRANDMASTER 262 LP 1
BR FOUR vakio#br1 MASTER 60 LP 1
EUW Waab#EUW CHALLENGER 635 LP 2
EUW MilkYippie#9840 MASTER 231 LP 2
EUW KimChaewon676767#NERV MASTER 188 LP 2
NA TinyJeff18#NA1 MASTER 205 LP 2
KR 작은거인#SOOP GRANDMASTER 514 LP 2
EUW Mujjiwaraa#EUW MASTER 308 LP 3
EUW Spoti#2137 MASTER 244 LP 3
NA Kurumx#FREAK GRANDMASTER 349 LP 3
NA LC Laharl#3836 MASTER 104 LP 3
KR 근연만화#TFT MASTER 272 LP 3
NA FL Cambulee#PMD MASTER 142 LP 4
NA wovencord#NA1 MASTER 122 LP 4
EUW blah blah blah#tft GRANDMASTER 448 LP 5
NA TinyJeff18#NA1 MASTER 205 LP 5
BR manu#ivy MASTER 240 LP 5
BR Taliyent#mao GRANDMASTER 425 LP 6
BR Подпольность#Nihil MASTER 82 LP 6
KR 혁 듕#KR1 GRANDMASTER 516 LP 6

Matchups vs

vs Summoner Zyra 134 encounters 49%
vs Solar Kayle 94 encounters 54%
vs Summoner Soraka 75 encounters 45%
vs Defender Cassiopeia 64 encounters 41%
vs Battlemage Sivir 59 encounters 53%
vs Executioner Zyra 42 encounters 50%
vs Rival Rengar 41 encounters 46%
vs Battlemage Nidalee 41 encounters 39%
vs Solar Xayah 39 encounters 36%
vs Emerald Aphelios 39 encounters 44%
vs Riftbeast Cinderling 35 encounters 40%
vs Greenfather Ezreal 33 encounters 33%
vs Riftbeast Pebbles 33 encounters 64%
vs Executioner Soraka 33 encounters 39%
vs Fae Tristana 32 encounters 44%
vs Rival Kha'Zix 30 encounters 40%
vs Caustic Kog'Maw 26 encounters 54%
vs FloraFatalis Soraka 24 encounters 71%
vs Rival Nidalee 22 encounters 0%
vs Blossom Ahri 20 encounters 45%

Board variants

CinderlingKog'MawKrugNidaleeSentinelSettSivirTaric
Baseline
7% of games 4.53 avg placement
CinderlingKog'MawKrugNidaleeRek'SaiSentinelSivirTaric
Sett
Rek'Sai
6% of games 6.87 avg placement
AsheCinderlingKog'MawKrugNidaleeSentinelSettSivirTaric
Ashe
5% of games 3.83 avg placement
Real versions of this comp's final board: which exact group of champions shows up together, how often, and the average placement of those games. Not a game-by-game history (Riot only exposes the end-of-game board, never how it got there): a comparison of builds, not a timeline.

Board add-ons (9th/10th unit)

Base board — 9 units 3.83 avg placement · 12 games
Not enough games with an extra unit for a reliable signal.
The main board above stops at 9 units: reaching a 10th slot needs level 10, which on its own already correlates strongly with a good placement. Below, the average placement of games with this base board plus one or two extra units, shown as a correlation to interpret, not a causal recommendation.

Incomplete attempts grouped here

Cinderling Caustic Cinderling 8 units 2 games · 3.00 avg placement
These comps share a strict subset of the units above (never an extra one) — likely attempts at this same comp, stopped partway rather than distinct archetypes.

Augment path

Data unavailable. Riot's API doesn't populate the augments field for this set — verified directly on the collected sample (the "augments" field doesn't even appear in the response, across 23,000+ real participants checked). The field does exist in the official schema and worked on older sets, so this probably isn't permanent — this section will activate automatically as soon as it fills in again.